1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0150(1998)3:4<202::aid-igs11>3.0.co;2-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indications for computer-assisted surgery in otorhinolaryngology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…mage-guided navigation systems are increasingly used for minimally invasive techniques like functional endoscopic surgery of the paranasal sinuses (FESS) 1,2 and other ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgical procedures [3][4][5] or in neurosurgery. 6 In FESS, only a limited view of the anatomy is warranted, and the use of these systems aims at avoiding injury to important anatomic structures around the orbit and the anterior skull base, especially the internal carotid artery, the optic nerve, and the floor of the anterior skull base.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…mage-guided navigation systems are increasingly used for minimally invasive techniques like functional endoscopic surgery of the paranasal sinuses (FESS) 1,2 and other ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgical procedures [3][4][5] or in neurosurgery. 6 In FESS, only a limited view of the anatomy is warranted, and the use of these systems aims at avoiding injury to important anatomic structures around the orbit and the anterior skull base, especially the internal carotid artery, the optic nerve, and the floor of the anterior skull base.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 In FESS, only a limited view of the anatomy is warranted, and the use of these systems aims at avoiding injury to important anatomic structures around the orbit and the anterior skull base, especially the internal carotid artery, the optic nerve, and the floor of the anterior skull base. 5 Although these systems improve orientation in narrow anatomic compartments, they lead to an increased intervention time 3 and the need for preoperative imaging. Although endoscopic sinus surgery with intraoperative MR imaging guidance is feasible, 7 the use of CT-based datasets for navigation is still standard, involving radiation exposure to the patient.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,14 The technology also could be applied to access routes with associated restricted visibility, biopsies, and surgical exploration for foreign bodies. [30][31][32][33] The use of high-tech equipment implies additional expense, and navigation cannot be justified in these times of limited health resources if it also necessitates additional staffing. It should be possible for the system to be operated by the surgeon or scrub nurse.…”
Section: Skull Base: An Interdisciplinary Approach/volume 11 Number mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors concluded that both navigational systems provided accurate localization data during sinus surgery and concurred with other authors that these technologies are not a substitute for anatomic knowledge, surgical training, or operative judgment. 111,116,119 Currently, the electromagnetic and the optical systems are the most widely used in otolaryngology because of their acceptable accuracy to within 2 mm or less, the freedom of head movement, and the ability to track a variety of instruments. 105 Opinion regarding the optimal use of navigational systems varies from using the technology in all endoscopic sinus cases 111 to selective use in revision surgery, abnormal anatomy, skull base surgery, or use for educational purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 105 Opinion regarding the optimal use of navigational systems varies from using the technology in all endoscopic sinus cases 111 to selective use in revision surgery, abnormal anatomy, skull base surgery, or use for educational purposes. 118,119 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%