2015
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in children with congenital and acquired heart disease: an expert consensus paper of the Imaging Working Group of the AEPC and the Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Section of the EACVI

Abstract: This article provides expert opinion on the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in young patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) and in specific clinical situations. As peculiar challenges apply to imaging children, paediatric aspects are repeatedly discussed. The first section of the paper addresses settings and techniques, including the basic sequences used in paediatric CMR, safety, and sedation. In the second section, the indication, application, and clinical relevance of CMR in the most fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
(145 reference statements)
0
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, TTE is often inadequate in patients with complex CHD, necessitating the use of complementary approaches. Emerging MRI techniques are able to visualize both intracardiac and extracardiac structures, and have a number of advantages that include functional as well as morphologic evaluation of complex CHD, a multiplanar capability with wide field of view, and no requirement for contrast medium or ionizing radiation [810]. However, the disadvantages of MR angiography (MRA) include a lower spatial resolution than other non-invasive techniques, poorer evaluation of the lung tissue and airways, and a long scanning time of 45–60 minutes that increases the risks associated with intubation and anesthesia [3, 4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, TTE is often inadequate in patients with complex CHD, necessitating the use of complementary approaches. Emerging MRI techniques are able to visualize both intracardiac and extracardiac structures, and have a number of advantages that include functional as well as morphologic evaluation of complex CHD, a multiplanar capability with wide field of view, and no requirement for contrast medium or ionizing radiation [810]. However, the disadvantages of MR angiography (MRA) include a lower spatial resolution than other non-invasive techniques, poorer evaluation of the lung tissue and airways, and a long scanning time of 45–60 minutes that increases the risks associated with intubation and anesthesia [3, 4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is routinely performed during follow-up after TCPC, particularly to assess ventricular size and function and to quantify large vessel flow, including the amount of collateral flow 98 102 . Death and (being listed for) heart transplantation have been associated with higher end-diastolic volume index (EDVi) (>125 mL/m 2 ) as assessed with CMR in adolescents with a Fontan circulation 103 , 104 .…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiac MR (CMR) imaging has been established as a clinically important technique for the assessment of cardiac morphology, function, perfusion, viability, and more recently quantitative myocardial tissue characterization (1)(2)(3). CMR is currently used to diagnose congenital heart disease (CHD), ischemic heart disease, valvular heart disease, pericardial lesions, cardiac tumors and cardiomyopathies, among others (4,5). However, CMR suffers from long acquisition times due to the need of obtaining images with high temporal and spatial resolution, different contrasts, and/or whole-heart coverage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%