1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf02552015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indications and use of abdominal angiography in trauma

Abstract: A series of 148 angiographic examinations in patients with blunt abdominal trauma have been reviewed. The major indications for arteriography were: (1) manifestations of shock in conjunction with clinical signs of abdominal injury; (2) the necessity for differentiation of multiple abdominal injuries; and (3) clinical signs of delayed rupture. Few false positive or false negative results were noted. The typical angiographic findings are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coils are also an option, particularly in the "back door embolization" technique, during which an extratumoral branch arising from a tumoral feeder is occluded for protective purposes to avoid ischemic complications. However, coils are not recommended as the sole embolic agent in tumor embolization because they cannot provide distal vessel embolization, which is necessary for hypervascular tumors with multiple collaterals [28]. The different embolic agents available do not provide the same effectiveness in terms of devascularization but they are complementary because of their different properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coils are also an option, particularly in the "back door embolization" technique, during which an extratumoral branch arising from a tumoral feeder is occluded for protective purposes to avoid ischemic complications. However, coils are not recommended as the sole embolic agent in tumor embolization because they cannot provide distal vessel embolization, which is necessary for hypervascular tumors with multiple collaterals [28]. The different embolic agents available do not provide the same effectiveness in terms of devascularization but they are complementary because of their different properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%