2012
DOI: 10.4236/mps.2012.24025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indications and Outcomes for Pedicled Pectoralis Major Myocutaneous Flaps at a Primary Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstructive Center

Abstract: The pectoralis major musculocutaneous (PMMC) flap has been a useful technique for head and neck reconstruction since its first description by Ariyan in 1979. However, techniques in microvascular surgery have since evolved and recently free tissue transfer has played an important role in head and neck reconstruction. Although we use free flaps as the first choice for head and neck reconstruction, similar to many other institutions, some patients at our hospital have undergone reconstruction with PMMC flaps. We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Total microvascular flap loss may be seen even in the hands of skilled surgeons, but total PMMC flap failure is very rare even under inexperienced hands, due to its dependable vascularity and its shorter procedural learning curve. 8 The drawbacks of PMMC flap are its higher complication rates; large bulk which contraindicates its use for reconstruction in superficial defects and less than satisfactory functional and esthetic result as compared to free flaps. 6 In addition, there may be resultant malocclusion due to the weight of the flap.…”
Section: 9mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Total microvascular flap loss may be seen even in the hands of skilled surgeons, but total PMMC flap failure is very rare even under inexperienced hands, due to its dependable vascularity and its shorter procedural learning curve. 8 The drawbacks of PMMC flap are its higher complication rates; large bulk which contraindicates its use for reconstruction in superficial defects and less than satisfactory functional and esthetic result as compared to free flaps. 6 In addition, there may be resultant malocclusion due to the weight of the flap.…”
Section: 9mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 In addition, there may be resultant malocclusion due to the weight of the flap. A review of relevant literature 4,6,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] (Table 3) shows that the overall complication rates vary from low (4.7%) to very high (60%); however, total necrosis of PMMC flap is low in most of the studies. Several studies on PMMC flap have also correlated higher complication with age, sex, site of reconstruction, previous therapy, etc.…”
Section: 9mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMMC) flaps, however, are kept reserved for salvage procedure in case of failure of free flaps, compromised patient status, or if planned as soft tissue filler in combination with free flaps. 3,4 Reconstruction with free flaps in developing country is difficult due to high cost, much time, poor infrastructure, advanced learning curve and scarcity of plastic surgeons. The pedicle flaps can be a deltopectoral flap (fasciocutaneous flap) or a myocutaneous flap that includes pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi, trapezius flaps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various pedicle regional flaps that have been advocated such as PMMC flap, deltopectoral flap, forehead flap [7]. Recently, the free tissue transfer is being practiced in several centers and are therefore considered as first choice for head and neck reconstruction because of the availability of micro vascular surgeon in many centers although, for all the patients, the free flap transfer cannot be used at every institute since it requires special techniques and equipment's for microsurgery [8,9]. Stephen Ariyan in 1979 described about the pectoralis major myocutaneous (PMMC) flap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%