2009
DOI: 10.1016/s1885-5857(09)72364-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indication for Defibrillator Implantation in a Patient With Prinzmetal's Angina and Syncopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is not surprising that diltiazem would reduce the cardiovascular event rate by reducing angina frequency as was shown by the results of Schroeder et al [18]. Clinical guidelines do not recommend the implantation of an ICD because the variant angina induced arrhythmia are secondary to an acute ischemia that may be controlled by medical therapy [22]. This issue can be corroborated by the finding that relapses and inefficient ICD treatments was most likely related to insufficient medical treatment and extensive ischemia [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, it is not surprising that diltiazem would reduce the cardiovascular event rate by reducing angina frequency as was shown by the results of Schroeder et al [18]. Clinical guidelines do not recommend the implantation of an ICD because the variant angina induced arrhythmia are secondary to an acute ischemia that may be controlled by medical therapy [22]. This issue can be corroborated by the finding that relapses and inefficient ICD treatments was most likely related to insufficient medical treatment and extensive ischemia [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our case that responded well to the combination of calcium channel blocker with cessation of the arrhythmia occurrence, leads us to re-evaluate the indication for ICD implantation if this dual therapy may abort the appearance of those life-threatening arrhythmias. Thus, It is necessary to carry out studies that evaluate the indication criteria for ICD as secondary prevention of potentially lethal arrhythmias due to coronary vasospasm [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%