2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indication Criteria of Hysteroscopic Surgery for Secondary Infertility due to Symptomatic Cesarean Scar Defect Based on Clinical Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of effectiveness, Zeller et al 103 demonstrated no significant difference in postoperative pregnancy rate between severe defect (RMT ≤3 mm) and non‐severe defect (RMT >3 mm) groups. Although RMT alone could not identify indications for resectoscopic surgery, our group revealed the indication criteria for hysteroscopic surgery by adding age as a factor 104 . The criterion was RMT ≥2.2 mm.…”
Section: Hysteroscopic Surgery In Women With Csdimentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of effectiveness, Zeller et al 103 demonstrated no significant difference in postoperative pregnancy rate between severe defect (RMT ≤3 mm) and non‐severe defect (RMT >3 mm) groups. Although RMT alone could not identify indications for resectoscopic surgery, our group revealed the indication criteria for hysteroscopic surgery by adding age as a factor 104 . The criterion was RMT ≥2.2 mm.…”
Section: Hysteroscopic Surgery In Women With Csdimentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although RMT alone could not identify indications for resectoscopic surgery, our group revealed the indication criteria for hysteroscopic surgery by adding age as a factor. 104 The criterion was RMT ≥2.2 mm. Various infertility factors exist in older patients; therefore, it is difficult to determine the indications for surgery using RMT alone.…”
Section: Hysteroscopic Surgery In Women With Csdimentioning
confidence: 99%