Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine Experts Committee Consensus Statement on ICU Planning and Designing, 2020

Abstract

Background: Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM) guidelines on Planning and Designing Intensive care (ICU) were first developed in 2001 and later updated in 2007. These guidelines were adopted in India, many developing Nations and major Institutions including NABH. Various international professional bodies in critical care have their own position papers and guidelines on planning and designing of ICUs; being the professional body of intensivists in India ISCCM therefore addresses the subject in contemporary context relevant to our clinical practice, its variability according to specialty and subspecialty, quality, resource limitation, size and location of the institution. Aim: To have a consensus document reflecting the philosophy of ISCCM to deliver safe & quality Critical Care in India, taking into consideration the requirement of regulatory agencies (national & international) and need of people at large, including promotion of training, education and skill upgradation. It also aiming to promote leadership and development and managerial skill among the critical care team. Material and Methods: Extensive review of literature including search of databases in English language, resources of regulatory bodies, guidelines and recommendations of international critical care societies. National Survey of ISCCM members and experts to understand their viewpoints on respective issues. Visiting of different types and levels of ICUs by team members to understand prevailing practices, aspiration and Challenges. Several face to face meetings of the expert committee members in big and small groups with extensive discussions, presentations, brain storming and development of initial consensus draft. Discussion on draft through video conferencing, phone calls, Emails circulations, one to one discussion Result: Based upon extensive review, survey and input of experts' ICUs were categorized in to three levels suitable in Indian setting. Level III ICUs further divided into sub category A and B. Recommendations were grouped in to structure, equipment and services of ICU with consideration of variation in level of ICU of different category of hospitals. Conclusion: This paper summarizes consensus statement of various aspect of ICU planning and design. Defined mandatory and desirable standards of all level of ICUs and made recommendations regarding structure and layout of ICUs. Definition of intensive care and intensivist, planning for strength of ICU and requirement of manpower were also described.

An Extensive Review of Health and Economy of Bangladesh Amid Covid-19 Pandemic

“…In line with international standards, a 100-bed hospital should have at least five ICUs (Tajmim, 2020b). In reality, hospitals in Bangladesh have less than 1200 ICU beds (432 govt, 737 private) in total against a population of 161.4 million people (Rungta et al, 2020). There are reportedly 1,769 ventilators in Bangladesh at this moment or in the pipeline, which means an average of one ventilator for every 93,273 people (Save the Children, 2020).…”

Covid-19 Situation in Bangladesh

“…The number of older persons in the country is over 0.8 million [21]. In line with international standards, a 100-bed hospital should have at least five ICUs [22]. In reality, hospitals in Bangladesh have less than 1200 ICU beds (432 govt, 737 private) in total against a population of 161.4 million people [23].…”

Fast tracking intensive care units and operation rooms during the COVID-19 pandemic in resource limited settings

“…In ideal conditions, that total bed strength of ICU recommended is between 8 and 12 and area recommended per bed is at least 150 square feet per. [ 18 ] However, for the expected surge of patients with COVID, the number of beds can be increased according to the space available provided the distance between the adjacent beds should be at least of 1.5-2 meters. The head end of each bed must be kept 2 feet away from the wall.…”