“…It is possible, as Rajadhyaksa (2003, 38) has argued, that "the Indian cinema's modes of address have opened up a new category for spectatorial address that appears not to be accounted for by, say, the American cinema". Much like the distinctive reception of Indian cinema by Nigerian spectators (Larkin 1997) or the Fijian Indians' Hindi film productions in Australia (Ray 2000), Rajadhyaksa (2003, 38) points out that possibly "the cinema's addresses are entering complex realms of identification in these places, which would definitely further argument around the nature of the cultural-political mediation that the Indian, or possibly the Hong Kong, cinemas continue to allow". Bollywood, hence, engages Tibetan spectators into such "realms of identification" (Rajad-4 The scholar of International Relations Dibyesh Anand has extensively discussed the construction of 'Tibetanness' among Tibetans exiles in South Asia.…”