1991
DOI: 10.1017/s0266078400005757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indian English

Abstract: Kachru (1965, 1966) has presented a detailed analysis of the idiosyncratic vocabulary items of Indian English (hereafter IE). He observes that “in India an idiom of English has developed which is Indian in the sense that there are formal and contextual exponents of Indianness in such writing, and the defining-context of such idiom is Indian setting” (1965:396). To illustrate how IE has become culture bound in India, he mentions many formations, such as confusion of caste, dung wash, saltgiver, rape-sister, etc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, while earlier studies identified characteristic features of the New Englishes, with a primary purpose of determining how they were different from the traditional native varieties, later studies have gone much beyond, seeking, instead, to determine how the New Englishes work as systems unto themselves. Examples of earlier studies on New Englishes include for example , Bauer, (1989) on New Zealand English ;Baumgardner, (1996), on Pakistani English; Gisborne, (2000), on Hong Kong English; and Bansal, (1976), Bakshi, (1991), and Hosali, (1991), on Indian English, to mention just a few. Later, larger-scale studies various international Englishes include Balasubramanian, (2009);Sedlatschek, (2009);Schilk, (2009);and Kirkpatrick, (2010).…”
Section: Research On New Englishesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, while earlier studies identified characteristic features of the New Englishes, with a primary purpose of determining how they were different from the traditional native varieties, later studies have gone much beyond, seeking, instead, to determine how the New Englishes work as systems unto themselves. Examples of earlier studies on New Englishes include for example , Bauer, (1989) on New Zealand English ;Baumgardner, (1996), on Pakistani English; Gisborne, (2000), on Hong Kong English; and Bansal, (1976), Bakshi, (1991), and Hosali, (1991), on Indian English, to mention just a few. Later, larger-scale studies various international Englishes include Balasubramanian, (2009);Sedlatschek, (2009);Schilk, (2009);and Kirkpatrick, (2010).…”
Section: Research On New Englishesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, while earlier studies identified characteristic features of the New Englishes, with a primary purpose of determining how they were different from the traditional native varieties, later studies have gone much beyond, seeking, instead, to determine how the New Englishes work as systems unto themselves. Examples of earlier studies on New Englishes include for example , Bauer, (1989) on New Zealand English ;Baumgardner, (1996), on Pakistani English ;Gisborne, (2000), on Hong Kong English; and Bansal, (1976), Bakshi, (1991), and Hosali, (1991), on Indian English, to mention just a few. Later, larger-scale studies various international Englishes include Balasubramanian, (2009);Sedlatschek, (2009);Schilk, (2009);and Kirkpatrick, (2010).…”
Section: Research On New Englishesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some teachers add some variations to teaching reading borrowed from other methods and approaches, the results seem to be unsatisfactory. Bakshi (1991) says that what the students know about English at graduation time is not more than a kind of superficial understanding of some English vocabulary meanings and few simple sentences. In the same way, Jalilifar (2010) believes that our students at pre-university level do not seem proficient enough to read and comprehend English language texts which results to losing interest in learning English for many of them and this could prevent them from success in academic English courses (Vardanjani, 2013).…”
Section: Issn: 2251-6204mentioning
confidence: 99%