India in international climate governance: Through soft power from REDD to REDD+ policy in favor of relative gains

Abstract

This paper seeks to examine India's role in the politics of a specific climate change mitigation policy called "Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, and enhancing forest carbon stocks in developing countries (REDD+)". It explores India's strategic behaviour towards the development of REDD policy. The paper argues that India had pushed for the remodelling of the global REDD negotiations by expanding its scope to conservation activities, which entails more direct benefits for India. This is largely due to differences in India's rates of forest cover and deforestation as compared to high forest -high deforestation countries such as Brazil and Indonesia. To substantiate its argument, the paper uses the main underpinnings of relative gains theory in international relations and applies them toward interpreting India's behaviour in negotiating REDD+ at global level. Further, the paper analyses the Indian strategies used to remodel the REDD mechanism using insights from soft power theory and its more recent amendments. Thematic analysis of the REDD-relevant documents as well as exploratory expert interviews have been employed for showing India's proactive role in the politics of REDD+. It is concluded that India indeed played a central role in critical past decisions, which lead to re-shaping REDD due to relative gains concerns and mainly by means of soft power strategies.

Mapping the fragmentation of the international forest regime complex: institutional elements, conflicts and synergies

“…Agreement on such principles, however, does not usually entail assigning clear responsibilities, budgets and staff for supporting any institutional element or organization from the outset. It is a discursive manner of paving the way for the next steps towards more detailed and operational regime elements , which is also highly political and conflictive, as demonstrated by the fight over the principle of Sustainable Forest Management vs. sustainable management of forests (Negi and Giessen 2018). We see the original contribution of the present analysis exactly in providing such fine-grained detail, which suggests that especially the conflictive aspects among institutional elements need to be put at the heart of analysis.…”

The geopolitics of negative emissions technologies: learning lessons from REDD+ and renewable energy for afforestation, BECCS, and direct air capture

“…This became also apparent in the negotiations on forest issues at the COPs where countries of the global South were not acting in unity (Allan & Dauvergne, 2013) but some -like e.g. India -could strongly influence the outcome (Negi & Giessen, 2018).…”

“…Is it a 'global carbon sink' which might, arguably, be used in order to allow industrial states to maintain an unsustainable lifestyle (McAfee, 2016)? This became also apparent in the negotiations on forest issues at the UNFCCC Conferences of the Parties (COP) where countries of the global South were not acting in unity (Allan & Dauvergne, 2013) but somesuch as for example, Indiacould strongly influence the outcome (Negi & Giessen, 2018).…”