2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00778-011-0236-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indexing in-network trajectory flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The third approach is to alternate time and space. For example, T-PARINET [26] is based on a combination of spatial partitioning and B+-tree local indexes. Except T-PARINET, the aim of such systems is indexing large historical trajectory data.…”
Section: Offline Processing Of Stdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third approach is to alternate time and space. For example, T-PARINET [26] is based on a combination of spatial partitioning and B+-tree local indexes. Except T-PARINET, the aim of such systems is indexing large historical trajectory data.…”
Section: Offline Processing Of Stdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving objects were usually abstracted as points (Ranu et al, 2015), single continuous polynomials (Ni and Ravishankar, 2007), or non-regulated sequences of roads in transportation networks (Sandu Popa et al, 2011). Then, these objects were indexed by the tree's derivatives, for example, B + -trees (Sandu Popa et al, 2011), R-trees (Yue et al, 2018), 3D R-trees (Xu et al, 2018), FN (fixed network) R-trees , PA-trees (Ni and Ravishankar, 2007), and grid trees (Yan et al, 2015). These tree-based indices could facilitate efficient queries on moving objects.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PARINET is another interesting alternative to represent trajectories constrained to a network [12]. It partitions trajectories into segments from an underlying road network using a complex cost model to minimize the number of disk accesses at query time.…”
Section: Trajectory Indexingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Ψ[5] = 12 and rank 1 (D, 12) = 3, the starting node is V [3] = 2. For illustration purposes note that it would correspond to S[A [12]]. By applying Ψ again, the next node of that trip would be obtained by computing Ψ[12] = 16, rank 1 (D, 16) = 4, and Regarding the space requirements of the CSA in CTR, we can expect to obtain a good compressibility due to the structure of the network, and the fact that trips that start in a given node or simply those going through that node will probably share the same sequence of "next" nodes.…”
Section: Spatial Component Of Ctrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation