2011 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/wacv.2011.5711534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indexing in large scale image collections: Scaling properties and benchmark

Abstract: Indexing quickly and accurately in a large collection of images has become an important problem with many applications. Given a query image, the goal is to retrieve matching images in the collection. We compare the structure and properties of seven different methods based on the two leading approaches: voting from matching of local descriptors vs. matching histograms of visual words, including some new methods. We derive theoretical estimates of how the memory and computational cost scale with the number of im… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aside from feature descriptor, there are three main issues of concern, namely, storage, computational cost and recognition performance. It is not surprising to observe that indexing huge databases images has become an active research topic recently [3].…”
Section: Applied Mechanics and Materials Vols 182-183mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from feature descriptor, there are three main issues of concern, namely, storage, computational cost and recognition performance. It is not surprising to observe that indexing huge databases images has become an active research topic recently [3].…”
Section: Applied Mechanics and Materials Vols 182-183mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two major approaches for building such databases: Bag of Words (BoW) [1,2,8,16,17,18] and Full Representation (FR) [2,11]. In the first, each image is represented by a histogram of occurrences of quantized features, and search is usually done efficiently using an Inverted File (IF) structure [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kd-Trees [11]). The first has the advantage of using an order of magnitude less storage, however its performance is far worse, see [2] for a benchmark. Hence, we focus on FR with Kd-Trees at its core.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations