2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.geosus.2023.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indexing habitat suitability and human-elephant conflicts using GIS-MCDA in a human-dominated landscape

W.K.N.C. Withanage,
M.D.K.L. Gunathilaka,
Prabuddh Kumar Mishra
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flat terrain (Figure 3a) of the study area may reveal the possibility of high groundwater potential. The slope of the area was categorized into five groups very high (0.018-1.5), high (1.6-3.9), moderate (4-8.3), low (8.4-15), and very low (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). Towards the center of the area, there is a slightly steeper slope.…”
Section: Slopementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The flat terrain (Figure 3a) of the study area may reveal the possibility of high groundwater potential. The slope of the area was categorized into five groups very high (0.018-1.5), high (1.6-3.9), moderate (4-8.3), low (8.4-15), and very low (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). Towards the center of the area, there is a slightly steeper slope.…”
Section: Slopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make the best choice feasible, MCDA is used to assess and contrast several factors, which are frequently at odds with one another [16]. Multi-criteria approaches are referred to in the academic community in a variety of ways, including multiple-criteria decision aiding (MCDA), multi-criteria decision making (MCDM), multiobjective decision making (MODM), and multi-attribute decision making (MADM) [16][17][18]. Different MCDA techniques are available, including the analytical hierarchy process (AHP), TOPSIS, PROMETHEE, ELECTRE, SWARA, WASPAS, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AHP is a commonly used multi‐criteria decision‐making method used to analyze and compare the relative importance of multiple criteria or solutions [7]. AHP provides a structured approach where decision‐makers can decompose complex decision‐making problems into hierarchical structures based on their own experience and knowledge, making the decision‐making process more organized and actionable [8]. In fact, the above decision‐making process makes AHP dependent on the subjective judgment and comparison of decision‐makers, so there is a risk of subjectivity and personal bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of GIS-MCDA has been used for various purposes such as the assessment of land suitability [11,[22][23][24][25], renewable energy [26][27][28][29], vulnerability to natural hazards [30,31], socio-environmental resilience [32], agricultural management [33], habitat suitability [34], spatial modeling of migration [35], and urban management [1,36,37]. In past studies, various GIS-MCDA methods such as AHP, Fuzzy AHP, Fuzzy TOPSIS, ANP, VIKOR, ELECTRE, and PROMETHEE have been used for these applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%