2009
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1080.0632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Index Policies for the Admission Control and Routing of Impatient Customers to Heterogeneous Service Stations

Abstract: We propose a general Markovian model for the optimal control of admissions and subsequent routing of customers for service provided by a collection of heterogeneous stations. Queue-length information is available to inform all decisions. Admitted customers will abandon the system if required to wait too long for service. The optimisation goal is the maximisation of reward rate earned from service completions, net of the penalties paid whenever admission is denied, and the costs incurred upon every customer los… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimization problem in (15) relates to station n alone, with U n the class of stationary policies for determining whether to admit (action a) or reject (action r) each generic arrival, the goal of optimization being the minimization of an aggregate customer waiting cost ( C n (u)) and rejection charges (W R n (u)). Call this station n problem P n (W ).…”
Section: Heuristic 2: Lagrangian Relaxation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization problem in (15) relates to station n alone, with U n the class of stationary policies for determining whether to admit (action a) or reject (action r) each generic arrival, the goal of optimization being the minimization of an aggregate customer waiting cost ( C n (u)) and rejection charges (W R n (u)). Call this station n problem P n (W ).…”
Section: Heuristic 2: Lagrangian Relaxation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 5 We declare a to be the action dictated by π W now that all S units of resource have been allocated.…”
Section: Lemma 1 Suppose That All K Products Are Fully Indexable Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Write W * for the maximising W in (12). In a context much simpler than the current one, Glazebrook et al [5] discuss how the nature of solutions to (4) and (12) can shed light on the performance of a greedy index heuristic. Should it be the case that, under full indexability, the policy π(W * ) which achieves V * be such that, the system states which require that π(W * ) take an inadmissible action have small probability, in equilibrium, then V * will be close to V opt and π W will be close to optimal.…”
Section: The Greedy Index Heuristic and The Importance Of Full Indexamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the random vector X N (t), we define the following Probability Generating Function (21) and the Moment Generating Function (22), conditioned on the environment vector d:…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we will restrict our attention to optimal control in a restless bandit problem as this provides a powerful optimization framework to model dynamic scheduling of activities. In particular, regarding optimal control of computing systems, the restless bandit framework has been successfully applied in for example the context of wireless downlink scheduling [3,7,33], load balancing problems [26], systems with delayed state observation [19], broadcast systems [35], multi-channel access models [2,27], stochastic scheduling problems [4,23,30] and scheduling in the presence of impatient customers [9,22,25,31]. distribution of the modulated environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%