2009
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2008.2005101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Index Policies for Resource Allocation in Wireless Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence the rate R (0,1) corresponds to the cumulative bit-rate of the scalable video stream consisting of video layersṼ (0,0) andṼ (0,1) . The differential rateR (0,1) comprising exclusively of the differential video rate arising (1,1) 226.40 67.730 0) ) 32.4000 2.8343 8.640 0.3280 V (1,2) 441.60 74.843 (2,1) 292.80 78.541 0) ))/2 18.1500 0.7924 4.840 0.1637 V (2,2) 575.90 86.788 1) ))/2 33.9500 0.5676 9.053 0.0627 V (3,0) 171.40 68.735 (Y (3,0) − Y (2,0) )/4 8.4750 0.4269 2.260 0.1889 V (3,1) 369.70 80.542 0) ))/4 10.7500 0.0733 2.866 0.0256 V (3,2) 727.30 89.000 from the quality layer enhancement frames is given as,…”
Section: ) Video Layer Frame Size Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Hence the rate R (0,1) corresponds to the cumulative bit-rate of the scalable video stream consisting of video layersṼ (0,0) andṼ (0,1) . The differential rateR (0,1) comprising exclusively of the differential video rate arising (1,1) 226.40 67.730 0) ) 32.4000 2.8343 8.640 0.3280 V (1,2) 441.60 74.843 (2,1) 292.80 78.541 0) ))/2 18.1500 0.7924 4.840 0.1637 V (2,2) 575.90 86.788 1) ))/2 33.9500 0.5676 9.053 0.0627 V (3,0) 171.40 68.735 (Y (3,0) − Y (2,0) )/4 8.4750 0.4269 2.260 0.1889 V (3,1) 369.70 80.542 0) ))/4 10.7500 0.0733 2.866 0.0256 V (3,2) 727.30 89.000 from the quality layer enhancement frames is given as,…”
Section: ) Video Layer Frame Size Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the next section we derive an optimal policy towards video quality maximization while ensuring fairness in QoS. (1,2) 0.8982 0.3289 0.1168 0.0389 V (2,0) 9.3842 2.7179 1.1494 0.7410 V (2,1) 0.8447 0.2993 0.1637 0.0639 V (2,2) 0.3737 0.1405 0.0627 0.0223 V (3,0) 1.2832 0.4206 0.1889 0.2299 V (3,1) 0.1351 0.0424 0.0256 0.0170 V (3,2) 0.0638 0.0198 0.0106 0.0063 …”
Section: ) Video Layer Quality Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations