2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-010-1762-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indeterminate laying and flexible clutch size in a capital breeder, the common eider

Abstract: Clutch size control in capital breeders such as large waterfowl has been much debated. Some studies have concluded that clutch size in ducks is determined before the start of laying and does not change in response to egg additions or removals. The response, however, may depend on the timing of tests, and experiments may have been too late for females to alter the number of eggs. We here study clutch size responses to predation of first and second eggs in the common eider, using protein fingerprinting of egg al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean host clutch reduction of about 0.3 eggs was calculated across all parasitised nests in our meta‐analysis, regardless of timing and number of parasitic eggs. Hosts are most likely to alter their egg production if CBP or egg predation occurs early in the laying sequence (Andersson and Eriksson 1982), in eiders particularly at the 1‐ or 2‐ egg stage (Waldeck et al 2011, also see Erikstad and Bustnes 1994). Early egg predation was often followed by increased egg laying in females that did not desert the nest (Waldeck et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean host clutch reduction of about 0.3 eggs was calculated across all parasitised nests in our meta‐analysis, regardless of timing and number of parasitic eggs. Hosts are most likely to alter their egg production if CBP or egg predation occurs early in the laying sequence (Andersson and Eriksson 1982), in eiders particularly at the 1‐ or 2‐ egg stage (Waldeck et al 2011, also see Erikstad and Bustnes 1994). Early egg predation was often followed by increased egg laying in females that did not desert the nest (Waldeck et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together with other evidence these results also show that eiders (and probably other ducks) are not determinate egg‐layers. They, like other ducks, can modify their egg production in response to parasitism, predation or other changes to the number of eggs in their nest early in the laying sequence (Andersson and Eriksson 1982, Erikstad and Bustnes 1994, Arnold et al 2002, Jaatinen et al 2009b, Waldeck et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Female eider body condition prior to breeding is widely acknowledged as a major determinant of clutch size [23,50,51]. However, clutch size is also affected by female age and timing of…”
Section: Clutch Size Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eiders may switch between islands at Rif after unsuccessful early nest initiation attempts in the previous years. We suspect that at Rif, parasitic egg laying (Waldeck et al 2011) can occur if the first eggs are predated (see Hanssen and Erikstad 2013), employed as a salvage strategy favored over a second nesting attempt.…”
Section: Which Individuals Are the First Nesters?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the Rif colony has some females that partially share nest attendance and over 20 % of the nests have parasitic egg laying (Kristjánsson and Jónsson 2015), i.e. individuals that lay their eggs in other females nests (Waldeck et al 2011). …”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%