Abstract:Objectives: To develop a hitherto unavailable risk factor model for accurately predicting anemia development in cancer patients before chemotherapy (CT) administration. Methods: 2,070 nonanemic patients from the European Cancer Anaemia Survey (ECAS) with hemoglobin (Hb) ≧12 g/dl at enrollment who received their first CT during ECAS and underwent at least two CT cycles were divided randomly into split half (SH) 1 and SH2 (n = 1,035 each). The model was developed on SH1 using logistic regression to simultaneousl… Show more
“…From various studies over the years, it is now possible to predict which cancer patients receiving chemotherapy are most likely to develop anemia [13]. Significant predictive factors for the risk of developing anemia include: a low initial hemoglobin (Hb) level (Յ12.9 g/dl in females and Յ13.4 g/dl in males), having lung or gynecologic cancers versus gastrointestinal (GI) or colorectal cancers, cancer at any site other than the GI tract or colon/rectum, treatment with platinum chemotherapy, and female gender [13].…”
Section: Consequences Of Anemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant predictive factors for the risk of developing anemia include: a low initial hemoglobin (Hb) level (Յ12.9 g/dl in females and Յ13.4 g/dl in males), having lung or gynecologic cancers versus gastrointestinal (GI) or colorectal cancers, cancer at any site other than the GI tract or colon/rectum, treatment with platinum chemotherapy, and female gender [13]. In lymphoma and multiple myeloma patients, factors found to significantly increase anemia risk were a low initial Hb level, persistent or resistant disease, platinum chemotherapy, and female gender [3].…”
Anemia is frequent in cancer patients and its incidence increases with chemotherapy. The probability of requiring transfusions also increases with chemotherapy. Anemia negatively impacts survival and accentuates fatigue in cancer patients. Cancer promotes inflammatory cytokine production, which suppresses erythropoiesis and erythropoietin (EPO) production. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) improve erythropoiesis and reduce transfusion needs in anemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. However, meta-analyses have shown an increased risk of thromboembolic (TE) events with ESA use during chemotherapy, but not increased on-study mortality or reduced overall survival. Three reasons have been proposed to explain why ESAs might have adverse effects in anemic cancer patients: tumor progression due to stimulation of tumor cell EPO receptors; increased risk of TE; and reduced survival. However, erythropoietin is not an oncogene, nor is the EPO receptor. It has also been demonstrated that erythropoietin does not stimulate tumor proliferation. Increased TE risk associated with ESAs is probably a consequence of increased blood viscosity due to excessive RBC mass elevation with concomitant plasma volume contraction, nitric oxide scavenging, and endothelial cell activation. Increased ESA dosing may also impact survival negatively because EPO contracts the plasma volume and stimulates inflammatory cytokine production independently of increasing erythropoiesis. Furthermore, transfusions themselves are associated with an increase in TE and plasma volume contraction, and these events are potentiated when ESAs are given with transfusions. An update on the management of anemia in oncology, the potential adverse events of ESAs, the benefits and risks of transfusions, and QoL are discussed in this paper. The
“…From various studies over the years, it is now possible to predict which cancer patients receiving chemotherapy are most likely to develop anemia [13]. Significant predictive factors for the risk of developing anemia include: a low initial hemoglobin (Hb) level (Յ12.9 g/dl in females and Յ13.4 g/dl in males), having lung or gynecologic cancers versus gastrointestinal (GI) or colorectal cancers, cancer at any site other than the GI tract or colon/rectum, treatment with platinum chemotherapy, and female gender [13].…”
Section: Consequences Of Anemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant predictive factors for the risk of developing anemia include: a low initial hemoglobin (Hb) level (Յ12.9 g/dl in females and Յ13.4 g/dl in males), having lung or gynecologic cancers versus gastrointestinal (GI) or colorectal cancers, cancer at any site other than the GI tract or colon/rectum, treatment with platinum chemotherapy, and female gender [13]. In lymphoma and multiple myeloma patients, factors found to significantly increase anemia risk were a low initial Hb level, persistent or resistant disease, platinum chemotherapy, and female gender [3].…”
Anemia is frequent in cancer patients and its incidence increases with chemotherapy. The probability of requiring transfusions also increases with chemotherapy. Anemia negatively impacts survival and accentuates fatigue in cancer patients. Cancer promotes inflammatory cytokine production, which suppresses erythropoiesis and erythropoietin (EPO) production. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) improve erythropoiesis and reduce transfusion needs in anemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. However, meta-analyses have shown an increased risk of thromboembolic (TE) events with ESA use during chemotherapy, but not increased on-study mortality or reduced overall survival. Three reasons have been proposed to explain why ESAs might have adverse effects in anemic cancer patients: tumor progression due to stimulation of tumor cell EPO receptors; increased risk of TE; and reduced survival. However, erythropoietin is not an oncogene, nor is the EPO receptor. It has also been demonstrated that erythropoietin does not stimulate tumor proliferation. Increased TE risk associated with ESAs is probably a consequence of increased blood viscosity due to excessive RBC mass elevation with concomitant plasma volume contraction, nitric oxide scavenging, and endothelial cell activation. Increased ESA dosing may also impact survival negatively because EPO contracts the plasma volume and stimulates inflammatory cytokine production independently of increasing erythropoiesis. Furthermore, transfusions themselves are associated with an increase in TE and plasma volume contraction, and these events are potentiated when ESAs are given with transfusions. An update on the management of anemia in oncology, the potential adverse events of ESAs, the benefits and risks of transfusions, and QoL are discussed in this paper. The
“…It has been found by the European Cancer Anaemia Survey (ECAS) that the incidence of anemia after the first cycle is 19.5% and after second cycle is 34.3% while after the third the incidence was more than 40%. Also single or combination chemotherapy play a serious and major role in anemia incidence and severity since the use of combination chemotherapy regimen will leads to severe anemia more than the use of single chemotherapy drug [48][49][50]. Besides chemotherapy myelosuppression, anemia can take place as a result of direct destruction of the RBC (i.e., direct effect on the erythropoiesis in the bone marrow) or reduced erythropoietin production (i.e., impact on EPO production).…”
“…Th is may be due to the reduction of erythropoesis, manifested by reduction of erythrocyte half-life, poor iron reutilization by the bone marrow and inadequate response to erythropoetin with reduced endogenous erythropoetin levels [4,5,6]. Anemia may have a signifi cantly negative eff ect on the quality of life of patients suff ering from malignant lymphoma, producing symptoms such as dizziness, fatigue, weakness, nausea, headache and depression [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tissue hypoxia triggers the synthesis and the release of erythropoietin into the blood. Erythropoietin is the primary regulator of human erythropoiesis and has two major functions: stimulating proliferation of erythroid progenitor cells and maintaining their viability by inhibiting their apoptosis [5,9]. In 1993, the use of erythropoietin was approved by the FDA for the treatment of anemia in cancer patients.…”
Introduction: Anemia is a common complication of malignant lymphomas, which could be a direct consequence of the disease or secondary to the myelosupressive chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of erythropoietin to treat anemia. The main objectives were to demonstrate increases in hemoglobin levels and the existence of an association between symptom relief and treatment. Material and method: In the Clinical Hematology and BMT Unit Tîrgu Mureș we performed an analytical, observational study to assess the role of erythropoietin treatment in malignant lymphoma related anemia. This linear, retrospective study included 127 patients diagnosed and treated with malignant lymphoma between January 1 st , 2007 and December 30, 2011. The 127 patients were divided into two groups: a group of patients (n = 88) who were treated with erythropoietin and the other group (n = 39) who did not receive this treatment. Patients included in the study received treatment with epoetin beta 40,000 IU/week. We followed the hemoglobin level and the symptomatology at baseline and after 4 weeks. Results: Patients who received treatment with erythropoietin had a 7.12 times higher possibility of being asymptomatic than patients who did not receive this treatment. The hemoglobin concentration of patients with erythropoietin treatment increased signifi cantly (p <0.0001) compared to the patients who did not receive this treatment. Conclusion: Effective treatment of anemia is an important aim in the management of patients with malignant lymphomas, because it increases their hemoglobin concentration, decreases the need of transfusion and maintains an acceptable quality of life.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.