2006
DOI: 10.1134/s0012496606060214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Independent origin of the trichoptile and neoptile in bird plumage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the above mentioned similarity gives evidence for an equally reliable alternative assumption that the protofeather evolved from a structure similar to the bristle scale. If this is the case, the protofeather is regarded as an elongated scale, which is insufficient for direct comparison with the feather or even with tri choptile, which is an elongated and hollow skin struc ture without a trace of a follicle (observed in embryos of some extant birds: Kundrát, 2004;Il'yashenko, 2006;Chernova, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the above mentioned similarity gives evidence for an equally reliable alternative assumption that the protofeather evolved from a structure similar to the bristle scale. If this is the case, the protofeather is regarded as an elongated scale, which is insufficient for direct comparison with the feather or even with tri choptile, which is an elongated and hollow skin struc ture without a trace of a follicle (observed in embryos of some extant birds: Kundrát, 2004;Il'yashenko, 2006;Chernova, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…30). These modified neo-natal feathers are known as trichoptiles and are present in Falconiformes, Cuculiformes and Rallidae (see Ilyashenko 2006).…”
Section: Guira Cuckoo Guira Guiramentioning
confidence: 99%