Independent Indians and the U.S.-Mexican War

Abstract

BRIAN DELAY IN THE SUMMER OF 1845, amid mounting concern that the United States and Mexico would go to war over Texas, the New Orleans Commercial Bulletin reported that a Comanche Indian force of "extraordinary magnitude" was preparing to descend upon the "weakened population" of northern Mexico. According to the editors, the whole of the Mexican north would soon be "engulfed in a terrible Indian war." This fact would "powerfully influence political relations" and "would have to be considered as a new element in diplomatic calculations." The translated article soon appeared in Mexican newspapers, including Durango's Registro Oficial. The paper's editors admitted that Comanches posed a tremendous threat, but blamed their "philanthropic" American neighbors for that. From Durango's perspective, Americans were "impelling" and "inviting" Indians across the frontier, encouraging "the evils that always attend the depredations of the savage," all with an eye to acquiring lands that excited the "insatiable greed" of the United States. 1 This cross-border conversation had a broad and tragic context. In the early 1830s, following what for most had been nearly two generations of imperfect peace, Comanches, Kiowas, Navajos, and several different tribes of Apaches dramatically increased their attacks upon northern Mexican settlements. While contexts and motivations varied widely, most of the escalating violence reflected Mexico's declining military and diplomatic capabilities, as well as burgeoning markets for stolen livestock and captives. Indian men raided Mexican ranches, haciendas, and towns, killing or capturing the people they found there, and stealing or destroying animals and other property. When able, Mexicans responded by attacking their enemies with comparable cruelty and avarice. Raids expanded, breeding reprisals and deepening enmities, until the searing violence touched all or parts of nine states. These events had powerful but virtually forgotten consequences for the course and outcome of the U.S.-Mexican War. In pursuing their own material, strategic, and cultural goals, indigenous polities in the Mexican north remade the ground upon which Mexico and the United States would compete in the mid-1840s. Raids and counter-raids claimed thousands of lives, ruined critical sectors of northern Mexico's I gratefully acknowledge those who have critiqued and encouraged this essay throughout its many incarnations:

The Coming of States? The Nineteenth Century

“…US Democrats led by President James K. Polk pointed to the Mexican inability to curb indigenous raids to justify the annexation of Texas and wage war on Mexico in the 1840s. 225 At a loss on how to control the borderlands, leaders of the still young republics looked to the recent past, emulating the Spanish colonizer they had fought only recently. Aware that the central government did not have enough resources to impose its will on the Llanos of Venezuela and eastern Colombia, Simón Bolívar encouraged the establishment of Catholic missions there.…”

‘What do you think it is that makes them who they are’? The connections between Latinx stereotypes, claims of white difference, and characters’ deaths in Breaking Bad

“…Americans perceived Mexicans as undeserving of the West’s vast resources as they appropriate more and more land through the 19th and 20th centuries (Limerick, 1987: 240, 243–244). Furthermore, the difficulty Mexico had defending its northern frontier from Comanche reinforced the perception that this territory should go to white Americans who could protect it (Delay, 2007: 36, 43; Greenberg, 2012: 21).…”

“Boys Are Running off to the Wars by Scores”: Promoting Masculinity and Conquest in the Coverage of the Mexican-American War

“…60 Furthermore, the difficulty Mexico had defending its northern frontier from Native Americans led whites to see Mexico as an easy target, reinforcing the perception that Mexicans were an inferior people and that Mexican men, unable to protect their land and families, were less masculine than whites. 61 Comparatively, American men believed they could defeat the Native Americans, claiming that American settlement had secured Texas and that US expansion into Mexico would do the same there. 62 Whites characterized Africans much like Native Americans.…”