1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-1599-1_41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Independent Component Analysis in Wave Decomposition of Auditory Evoked Fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiments on different kinds of real life data have also been performed using the contrast functions and algorithms introduced above. These applications include artifact cancellation in EEG and MEG [36], [37], decomposition of evoked fields in MEG [38], and feature extraction of image data [25], [35]. These experiments further validate the ICA methods introduced in this paper.…”
Section: Simulation and Experimental Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Experiments on different kinds of real life data have also been performed using the contrast functions and algorithms introduced above. These applications include artifact cancellation in EEG and MEG [36], [37], decomposition of evoked fields in MEG [38], and feature extraction of image data [25], [35]. These experiments further validate the ICA methods introduced in this paper.…”
Section: Simulation and Experimental Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Taking the instantaneous gradient of the approximation of negentropy in (7) with respect to , and taking the normalization into account, one obtains the following Hebbian-like learning rule: normalize (38) where . This is equivalent to the learning rule in [24], except that the self-adaptation constant is different.…”
Section: Appendix B Adaptive Neural Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ce dernier point est abordé dans [92] et [80] La séparation de potentiels évoqués, induits par des stimulations de natures différentes, a été considérée dans [123]. R. N. Vigario et al ont montré, en utilisant toujours l'algorithme développé dans [77], que les méthodes de SAS sont capables, à partir de stimulations somesthésiques et auditives simultanées, de différencier les réponses du cerveau à ces stimuli sur les enregistrements MEG.…”
Section: ) Les Algorithmes Icar Et Birthunclassified
“…One such technique that we have used is blind source separation (BSS). BSS has been shown to segregate neuronal from nonneuronal signals, and neuronal signals from each other, in both EEG [Jung et al, 2000a, b;Makeig et al, 1997Makeig et al, , 1999 and MEG [Cao et al, 2000;Tang et al, 2000aTang et al, ,b, 2002Tang and Pearlmutter, 2003;Vigário et al, 1998Vigário et al, , 1999Vigário et al, , 2000Wü bbeler et al, 2000;Ziehe et al, 2000]. For these reasons, despite its limitations, it seems feasible to use the localizer proposed above as a stage in a practical robust real-time MEG processing pipeline.…”
Section: Figure 12mentioning
confidence: 99%