2005
DOI: 10.1128/jb.187.18.6354-6362.2005
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Independent and Interchangeable Multimerization Domains of the AbrB, Abh, and SpoVT Global Regulatory Proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since CwlD is essential for the generation of the cortex-specific modification, muramic acid ␦-lactam (MAL) (35), it is possible that the cortical PG in spoVT spores has less MAL than that in wild-type spores. If this is the case, even though SpoVT appears to repress expression of one cortex-lytic enzyme (CLE), SleB (42), the degradation of cortex PG might be slower during germination of spoVT spores, since MAL is the recognition element for SleB as well as the other redundant CLE, CwlJ (34,35). Indeed, spoVT spores have significantly longer ⌬T lysis s for both AGFK and L-valine germination, and SpoVT is also an activator of a spore cortex protein, CoxA (41), although the function of this protein is not known.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since CwlD is essential for the generation of the cortex-specific modification, muramic acid ␦-lactam (MAL) (35), it is possible that the cortical PG in spoVT spores has less MAL than that in wild-type spores. If this is the case, even though SpoVT appears to repress expression of one cortex-lytic enzyme (CLE), SleB (42), the degradation of cortex PG might be slower during germination of spoVT spores, since MAL is the recognition element for SleB as well as the other redundant CLE, CwlJ (34,35). Indeed, spoVT spores have significantly longer ⌬T lysis s for both AGFK and L-valine germination, and SpoVT is also an activator of a spore cortex protein, CoxA (41), although the function of this protein is not known.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no knowledge of how G levels may vary between individual spores or how much stochasticity might affect an individual spore's G levels. There is also a forespore-specific transcriptional regulatory protein, SpoVT, which modulates the expression of a number of G -dependent genes (1,3,38,41,42). SpoVT can be either a positive or a negative regulator of gene expression, and in spores prepared by resuspension in a poor medium, SpoVT represses levels of expression of operons encoding GRs ϳ3-fold and slightly stimulates the expression of the forespore-specific spoVA operon that encodes a number of proteins likely involved in spore germination by allowing the spore's large depot (ϳ20% of spore core dry weight) of pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylic acid (dipicolinic acid [DPA]) to leave the germinating spore, one of the earliest events in spore germination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an in-depth inspection performed with the PSI-BLAST and CDD searches and secondary structure predictions (16) highlighted the presence of a SpoVT/AbrB-like domain in the translated protein. This motif is present in a family of prokaryotic factors demonstrated to be repressors, activators, or ambiactive, depending on the specific case (18,62).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rep locus is comprised of four ORFs: ORF c68 encodes a putative transcription factor containing an SpoVT/AbrBlike domain (18,62), typical of a bacterial family of transcription factors. Since this kind of transcription factor gene is missing on other prokaryotic plasmids and is present on the genomes of pSSVi, of STSV1 (Sulfolobus tengchongensis spindle-shaped virus), and SIFV (Sulfolobus islandicus filamentous virus) (40), it is tempting to speculate that acquisition by the pSSVx genome of ORFc68 as well as of ORF154 to ORF288 has been crucial for the development of a viral nature and for the ability to respond to diverse viral stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several charged residues in this domain, including the positively charged Lys 67 , Arg 75 , and Arg 83 residues, were identified to be crucial, which indicated that these positively charged residues might contribute to DNA binding by interacting with the negatively charged DNA and demonstrated a critical involvement of the AbrB-like domain in the negative regulatory role of the PhaR in H. mediterranei. AbrB and AbrB-like proteins usually function as dimers or tetramers (44,47). In bacteria, PhaR was also shown to form a tetramer in vitro (43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%