2012
DOI: 10.3354/meps09507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Independence of neutral and adaptive divergence in a low dispersal marine mollusc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Mariani et al. ) and on populations separated by approximately one hundred meters. Nevertheless, considering the limitations linked to the RTE and the P ST ‐ F ST comparisons, complementary studies involving replication at the population level (see Kawecki and Ebert ) or genomic approach (Palumbi et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Mariani et al. ) and on populations separated by approximately one hundred meters. Nevertheless, considering the limitations linked to the RTE and the P ST ‐ F ST comparisons, complementary studies involving replication at the population level (see Kawecki and Ebert ) or genomic approach (Palumbi et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such information is fundamental to understand eco-evolutionary processes (Slatkin, 1987) and can be useful for the conservation of intraspecific biodiversity in the case of vulnerable or highly exploited species (Hilborn et al, 2003;Mariani et al, 2012). While advances in molecular biology are providing increased resolution of biocomplexity among marine taxa, there remains a major demand to obtain reliable and informative biological information for a plethora of populations/species at low operational costs for management and conservation purposes (Frankham, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While advances in molecular biology are providing increased resolution of biocomplexity among marine taxa, there remains a major demand to obtain reliable and informative biological information for a plethora of populations/species at low operational costs for management and conservation purposes (Frankham, 2010). As such, comparative studies of morphological and genetic divergence can still have an important contribution to biodiversity conservation (Strange et al, 2008;Mariani et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() and Mariani et al. () observed that genetic differentiation of the common whelk increased with geographic distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In more recent studies, sexual dimorphism has been demonstrated in populations on both sides of the N‐Atlantic, where females have on average higher and heavier shells (Kenchington & Glass, ; Ten Hallers‐Tjabbes, ). Thomas and Himmelman () linked increased shell thickness and elongated apertures of Canadian common whelk with lobster and crab predation, and phenotypic differentiation in shell morphology of common whelk around Ireland appears to be driven by environmental variation (Mariani et al., ). Genetic analysis of migration trends in three locations in the UK indicated an inshore–offshore migration of whelk, which could be linked to inshore–offshore gradients in environmental variables (Weetman et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%