The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indenyl complexes of Group 9 metals: Synthetic and catalytic chemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 269 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, only partial consumption of the starting materials was evident along with the generation of a complex mixture of products. This demonstrated that [Rh(Ind)(C 2 H 4 ) 2 ] reacts much more readily with SIPr than the Cp* analogue, a manifestation of the “indenyl effect” where auxiliary ligand substitution is accelerated as a result of η 3 coordination of the indenyl ligand driven by recovery of benzene ring aromaticity [33a] . A single crystal X‐ray diffraction study identified 10 as one of products from the reaction and provided evidence for one of the pathways involving loss of one ethylene ligand, C−H activation of the other and loss of two H atoms to generate a Rh−Rh bonded dimer with bridging σ,π‐vinyl ligands (see the Supporting Information for structure).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, only partial consumption of the starting materials was evident along with the generation of a complex mixture of products. This demonstrated that [Rh(Ind)(C 2 H 4 ) 2 ] reacts much more readily with SIPr than the Cp* analogue, a manifestation of the “indenyl effect” where auxiliary ligand substitution is accelerated as a result of η 3 coordination of the indenyl ligand driven by recovery of benzene ring aromaticity [33a] . A single crystal X‐ray diffraction study identified 10 as one of products from the reaction and provided evidence for one of the pathways involving loss of one ethylene ligand, C−H activation of the other and loss of two H atoms to generate a Rh−Rh bonded dimer with bridging σ,π‐vinyl ligands (see the Supporting Information for structure).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This demonstrated that [Rh(Ind)(C 2 H 4 ) 2 ] reacts much more readily with SIPr than the Cp* analogue, a manifestation of the “indenyl effect” where auxiliary ligand substitution is accelerated as a result of η 3 coordination of the indenyl ligand driven by recovery of benzene ring aromaticity. [33a] A single crystal X‐ray diffraction study identified 10 as one of products from the reaction and provided evidence for one of the pathways involving loss of one ethylene ligand, C−H activation of the other and loss of two H atoms to generate a Rh−Rh bonded dimer with bridging σ,π‐vinyl ligands (see the Supporting Information for structure). This structure is very similar to products formed in the reaction of [Rh(Ind)(C 2 H 4 ) 2 ] or [Rh(1‐MeInd)(C 2 H 4 ) 2 ] with Me−C≡C−Me, which gave a Rh dimer containing one bridging vinyl and one bridging 1,2‐dimethylvinyl ligand.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, indenyl is capable to provide an additional free coordination site at a metal atom as a result of an easy slippage of indenyl ligand from η 5 to η 3 coordination mode (the so called “indenyl effect”) [7] . However, this flexibility leads to a weakening of the metal‐indenyl bond, which limits the catalytic applications of indenyl complexes [6a] . For example, while rhodium complexes with the parent unsubstituted indenyl ligand C 9 H 7 efficiently catalyze the reductive amination of carbonyl compounds, [8] they are almost inactive in the oxidative coupling of benzoic acids with alkynes due to the loss of the indenyl ligand [8a] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the substitution of COD in half-sandwich complexes is typically used for the preparation of organometallic derivatives for catalytic studies. 11–17 It was shown later that this type of reactivity was observed for the pentamethylated analogue of 1 ( i.e. , [Cp*Ir(COD)Br] + ( 3 ) transforms into [Cp*Ir(P(OMe) 3 ) 2 Br] + ( 4 ) under the same conditions).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%