2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(02)00175-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indentation size effect in polycrystalline F.C.C. metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

10
53
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
10
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption was supported by the experimental results that experimental data of logarithmic SSCR versus sustained stress seemed to be approximately linear (Cao et al, 2012;Elmustafa and Stone, 2002;Raj and Langdon, 1989;Wang et al, 2009aWang et al, , 2009bWang et al, , 2011. On the other hand, a pure power-law relation of ε σ ∝ ss n was also assumed in the one-temperature approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This assumption was supported by the experimental results that experimental data of logarithmic SSCR versus sustained stress seemed to be approximately linear (Cao et al, 2012;Elmustafa and Stone, 2002;Raj and Langdon, 1989;Wang et al, 2009aWang et al, , 2009bWang et al, , 2011. On the other hand, a pure power-law relation of ε σ ∝ ss n was also assumed in the one-temperature approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Then, one can obtain the activation volume from the experimentally determined relationship between nominal activation energy and sustained stress. In the literature, however, some researchers were trying to determine the activation volume from creep tests under various sustained stresses at only one temperature, usually room temperature (RT) (Cao et al, 2012;Elmustafa and Stone, 2002;Raj and Langdon, 1989;Wang et al, 2009aWang et al, , 2009bWang et al, , 2011. This approach is called one-temperature approach hereafter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the technique has also been fraught with potential artifacts, many of which are related to a phenomenon known as the "indentation size effect" [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. This typically refers to the simple observation that the hardness measured by an indentation test is often not constant, but instead changes with applied load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hardness exhibits large scatter at very shallow depths, and then changes steadily with the indentation depth. For the very shallow indentations, the hardness variation can be explained by the indentation size effect or strain gradient plasticity theory [4]. Hardness change at deeper indentations can be explained by the substrate effect [5], although hardness, a measure of the materials ductile properties, should not change significantly with indentation depth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Joslin-Oliver method, the contact area is eliminated. As a result, equations (2) and (3) can be rearranged as: (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%