2004
DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2004.824795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incremental Verification and Synthesis of Discrete-Event Systems Guided by Counter Examples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The requirement for always enabled events can be further relaxed by considering conditionally always enabled events [15], where the remaining automata of the system are examined more closely using an incremental controllability check [24]. Then an event η is considered as always enabled when simplifying an automaton G, if the environment T enables η in all states (x G , x T ) of G T where η is enabled in the state x G of G. This approach allows for more events to be considered as always enabled, but repeatedly checking such conditions of all the automata not being abstracted is time-consuming [15].…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requirement for always enabled events can be further relaxed by considering conditionally always enabled events [15], where the remaining automata of the system are examined more closely using an incremental controllability check [24]. Then an event η is considered as always enabled when simplifying an automaton G, if the environment T enables η in all states (x G , x T ) of G T where η is enabled in the state x G of G. This approach allows for more events to be considered as always enabled, but repeatedly checking such conditions of all the automata not being abstracted is time-consuming [15].…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that controllability of subsystems implies controllability of the global system (Brandin et al, 2004). This suggests that global controllability can be ensured if each subsystem is controllable on its own.…”
Section: Conf(f (H)) = ∅ This Means That F (H) Is Nonblocking Iementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, tasks such as persistent surveillance could not be specified. Incremental verification and synthesis for other types of systems and specifications can be found, e.g., in [18]- [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%