2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incremental theories of intelligence predict multiple document comprehension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
1
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
35
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that teachers who believe that intelligence is not a fixed trait and that it can be increased by the environment have higher Australian Journal of Teacher Education Vol 40, 1, January 2015 75 expectations from their students in their performance than those teachers who see intelligence as inflexible and stable. Past research has shown that students who endorse incremental theories of intelligence have higher academic performance than those who approve of the entity theory (Braasch, Braten, Stromso, & Anmarkrud, 2014;Good, Aronson, & Inzlicht, 2003). The results of this study indicate that likewise, teachers who support the incremental theory of intelligence see higher potentials in students and therefore rate their performance lower than teachers who have the opposite view.…”
Section: Regression Analysesmentioning
confidence: 39%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This implies that teachers who believe that intelligence is not a fixed trait and that it can be increased by the environment have higher Australian Journal of Teacher Education Vol 40, 1, January 2015 75 expectations from their students in their performance than those teachers who see intelligence as inflexible and stable. Past research has shown that students who endorse incremental theories of intelligence have higher academic performance than those who approve of the entity theory (Braasch, Braten, Stromso, & Anmarkrud, 2014;Good, Aronson, & Inzlicht, 2003). The results of this study indicate that likewise, teachers who support the incremental theory of intelligence see higher potentials in students and therefore rate their performance lower than teachers who have the opposite view.…”
Section: Regression Analysesmentioning
confidence: 39%
“…Researchers have investigated the relationship between learners' implicit theories of intelligence and their academic achievement (Braasch, Braten, Stromso, & Anmarkrud, 2014;Good, Aronson, & Inzlicht, 2003). All studies have shown that learners' beliefs in incremental theory lead to their higher performance.…”
Section: Intelligence In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevant to the focus of our study, past research has indicated that students who favored incremental over entity beliefs have higher grades (Romero, Master, Paunesku, Dweck, & Gross, 2014), endorse more learning goals (Blackwell, Trzesniewski, & Dweck, 2007), use better reading strategies (Braasch, Braten, Stromso, & Anmarkrud, 2014), and practice more (Cury, Da Fonseca, Zahn, & Elliot, 2008). Conversely, entity beliefs have been linked with decreases in intrinsic motivation (Haimovitz, Wormington, & Corpus, 2011) and academic disengagement (Martin, Nejad, Colmar, & Liem, 2013).…”
Section: Implicit Ability Beliefsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Also according to Jacobson (), this task is valid for assessing word recognition skills, as evidenced by its positive correlation with measures of both silent reading and oral word reading. In previous research with Norwegian students (e.g., Andreassen & Bråten, ; Braasch, Bråten, Strømsø, & Anmarkrud, ; Bråten, Ferguson, Anmarkrud, & Strømsø, ; Samuelstuen & Bråten, ), scores on this measure have correlated from about .20 to above .50 with text comprehension.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%