Natural Language Generation 1987
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-3645-4_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incremental Sentence Production, Self-Correction and Coordination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have investigated whether the syntactic structure of self-repairs shows any signs of systematicity (e.g., de Smedt-Kempen 1987;Levelt 1983) and have found that the majority of self-corrections follow a specific rule, which was named the Well-formedness Rule by Levelt (1983). (Previous investigations concerning this field were discussed in detail by Kormos (1999), therefore, only a very brief summary of earlier findings will be presented here).…”
Section: Overview Of Earlier Studies On the Structure Of Self-repairsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have investigated whether the syntactic structure of self-repairs shows any signs of systematicity (e.g., de Smedt-Kempen 1987;Levelt 1983) and have found that the majority of self-corrections follow a specific rule, which was named the Well-formedness Rule by Levelt (1983). (Previous investigations concerning this field were discussed in detail by Kormos (1999), therefore, only a very brief summary of earlier findings will be presented here).…”
Section: Overview Of Earlier Studies On the Structure Of Self-repairsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have proposed that language production is incremental, such that more readily retrieved information is accorded priority during processing (e.g., Bock, 1982;De Smedt & Kempen, 1987;Kempen & Hoenkamp, 1987;Levelt, 1989). Under this assumption, the syntactic structure of an utterance reflects in part the order in which information becomes available during the syntactic stages of processing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will not further elaborate on general aspects of word order in an SG for Dutch. For further discussion of SG and its role in generation we refer to (De Smedt 1990b;De Smedt-Kempen 1991). We will now turn to those aspects dealing with discontinous constituency.…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%