52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 2013
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2013.6760374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incremental sampling-based algorithm for minimum-violation motion planning

Abstract: Abstract-This paper studies the problem of control strategy synthesis for dynamical systems with differential constraints to fulfill a given reachability goal while satisfying a set of safety rules. Particular attention is devoted to goals that become feasible only if a subset of the safety rules are violated. The proposed algorithm computes a control law, that minimizes the level of unsafety while the desired goal is guaranteed to be reached. This problem is motivated by an autonomous car navigating an urban … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reyes Castro et al [17] translate LTL specifications into an automaton. A second automaton is created as a discrete abstraction of an RRT*-explored workspace.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reyes Castro et al [17] translate LTL specifications into an automaton. A second automaton is created as a discrete abstraction of an RRT*-explored workspace.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum constraint removal [7] problem asks to remove the fewest constraints in order to yield a feasible path. Similar work has addressed violating lowpriority tasks for multi-objective tasks specified in terms of LTL formulas [3]. Rather than removing constraints in binary fashion, MCD considers continuous changes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karaman and Frazzoli (2011) proposed RRT * and PRM * , the probabilistically optimal counterparts of RRT and PRM. Sampling-based methods have been employed in dealing with kinematic constraints (Hauser and Zhou, 2016; Kleinbort et al, 2019; Moore et al, 2014; Webb and van den Berg, 2013), stochastic robot models (Agha-mohammadi et al, 2014; Burns and Brock, 2007; Hauser, 2011; van den Berg et al, 2011; Vasile et al, 2016), multi-robot systems (Dobson et al, 2017; Kantaros and Zavlanos, 2019), in applications such as autonomous driving (Kuwata et al, 2009; Reyes Castro et al, 2013; Vasile et al, 2017b), manipulation (He et al, 2017; Muhayyuddin et al, 2018), and surgery (Baykal et al, 2019). A more detailed exposition of sampling-based methods can be found in Kingston et al (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deal with the state-space explosion problem, they propose a layered path planning approach that uses a cell decomposition of the configuration space for high-level temporal planning and expansive space trees (EST) for kino-dynamic planning of the low-level, cell-to-cell motion. The on-line algorithm from Tumova et al (2013) and Reyes Castro et al (2013) finds minimum violating paths for a robot when the global specification cannot be enforced completely. In Livingston and Murray (2013) and Livingston et al (2013), the global specifications are given in the GR(1) fragment of LTL, and on-line local re-planning is done through patching invalidated paths based on μ -calculus specifications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%