Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2013 2013
DOI: 10.5244/c.27.92
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incremental Line-based 3D Reconstruction using Geometric Constraints

Abstract: Generating accurate 3D models for man-made environments can be a challenging task due to the presence of texture-less objects or wiry structures. Since traditional point-based 3D reconstruction approaches may fail to integrate these structures into the resulting point cloud, a different feature representation is necessary. We present a novel approach which uses point features for camera estimation and additional line segments for 3D reconstruction. To avoid appearance-based line matching, we use purely geometr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a quantitative evaluation we used the synthetic Timberframe 1 dataset from [6], since there is a groundtruth CAD model available. Figure 2 shows our result in comparison to related state-of-the-art methods [2,3,6]. As can be seen, our proposed method achieves more accurate results than a previous incremental approach [3] (RMSE 0.095 vs. 0.196), while the runtime is not largely increased (6.9 vs. 5.7 min).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a quantitative evaluation we used the synthetic Timberframe 1 dataset from [6], since there is a groundtruth CAD model available. Figure 2 shows our result in comparison to related state-of-the-art methods [2,3,6]. As can be seen, our proposed method achieves more accurate results than a previous incremental approach [3] (RMSE 0.095 vs. 0.196), while the runtime is not largely increased (6.9 vs. 5.7 min).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Figure 2 shows our result in comparison to related state-of-the-art methods [2,3,6]. As can be seen, our proposed method achieves more accurate results than a previous incremental approach [3] (RMSE 0.095 vs. 0.196), while the runtime is not largely increased (6.9 vs. 5.7 min). That is off course due to the non-greedy nature of our approach and the incorporation of collinearity information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…[7]), or because the vast majority of line matching approaches are not able to handle the real challenging cases, such as wiry objects. Nevertheless, a few methods which are capable of handling such objects as well have been presented recently [15,13,12,11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to a variety of reasons. In the case of lines, there are many scenes where it is difficult to establish correspondences based on appearance, for example in highly repetitive manmade scenes or where low-width structures are present [16]. Furthermore, feature appearance can vary dramatically between 3D and its 2D projection due to the non-linear nature of the transformation; a 3D feature may be projected from a large range of viewpoints and perspective distortion may occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%