2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/928051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incremental Graph Regulated Nonnegative Matrix Factorization for Face Recognition

Abstract: In a real world application, we seldom get all images at one time. Considering this case, if a company hired an employee, all his images information needs to be recorded into the system; if we rerun the face recognition algorithm, it will be time consuming. To address this problem, In this paper, firstly, we proposed a novel subspace incremental method called incremental graph regularized nonnegative matrix factorization (IGNMF) algorithm which imposes manifold into incremental nonnegative matrix factorization… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare our method to the following representative methods: (1) INMF (Bucak and Gunsel 2009), INMFSC (Wang and Cai 2014), L 1/2 INMF (Dang et al 2017), IGNMF (Yu et al 2014), IGNMFSC (Wang and Sun 2017) and IOPNMF Lu 2011, 2013); and (2) NMF (Lee and Seung 1999), ONMF (Yoo and Choi 2008). The first six methods are incremental learning methods and the other two methods are non-incremental algorithms.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compare our method to the following representative methods: (1) INMF (Bucak and Gunsel 2009), INMFSC (Wang and Cai 2014), L 1/2 INMF (Dang et al 2017), IGNMF (Yu et al 2014), IGNMFSC (Wang and Sun 2017) and IOPNMF Lu 2011, 2013); and (2) NMF (Lee and Seung 1999), ONMF (Yoo and Choi 2008). The first six methods are incremental learning methods and the other two methods are non-incremental algorithms.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang and Cai (2014) proposed an incremental learning algorithm for NMF under sparse constraints (INMFSC) that improves the sparseness of the factor matrices. Yu et al (2014) advanced incremental graph regulated NMF (IGNMF) to achieve a better classification by maintaining the neighborhood distribution structure of the original highdimensional data during the process of dimension reduction. Dang et al (2017) integrated sparse constraints with incremental learning to devise an incremental NMF with L 1/2 sparse constraints (L 1/2 INMF) and successfully applied it to SAR image recognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [25], an algorithm based on a clustered multitask network was proposed, which considered sparsity, clustering, and neighborhood information. Extension of different regularized NMF models has received significant attention in data mining [23,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. Most of these regularized NMF models are solved by the MU method because it is easy to implement and often yields good results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al [16] introduced the geometric structure of data into incremental NMF [17,18] and utilized two efficient sparse approximations, buffering and random projected tree, to process large-scale datasets. Yu et al [19] also presented an incremental GNMF algorithm to improve scalability. But these algorithms only performed well for incremental or streaming datasets and could not deal with large-scale batch datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%