2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.04.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incremental dynamic analysis of small to medium spans plain concrete arch bridges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fragility analysis method is widely used to study the seismic performance of structures. Yazdani et al [9,10] evaluated the seismic performance of plain concrete arch bridges under near-field and far-field earthquakes using an incremental dynamic analysis method. Chen et al [11] revealed the potential failure modes of concrete gravity dams through incremental dynamic analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fragility analysis method is widely used to study the seismic performance of structures. Yazdani et al [9,10] evaluated the seismic performance of plain concrete arch bridges under near-field and far-field earthquakes using an incremental dynamic analysis method. Chen et al [11] revealed the potential failure modes of concrete gravity dams through incremental dynamic analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another interesting line of research is the study of the behaviour of masonry bridges subjected to certain external actions that may compromise their stability. In particular, the analysis of recent collapses has shown that masonry bridges are particularly vulnerable to the phenomena that cause the failure of their supports [17,26,29,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] and to high intensity seismic actions [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57], as evidenced by the collapse of the Claro Bridge [58] during the 2010 Maule, Chile earthquake. In recent years, numerous studies have been developed to investigate the structural implications of foundation settlement on the bearing capacity of the bridge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this need in mind, in recent years, different calculation methods and guidelines (e.g., UIC guideline) 1 for the evaluation of the ultimate (ULS) and serviceability limit states (SLS) of masonry bridges have been developed. Among the available methods for the structural analysis of masonry bridges, it is possible to find: simplified methods (Zhang et al, 2018), numerical method for assess the seismic capacity (Pelà et al, 2013;Zampieri et al, 2014Zampieri et al, , 2015aSarhosis et al, 2016;Mahmoudi Moazam et al, 2018;Marefat et al, 2019), methods based on the limit analysis (Basilio et al, 2014;Chiozzi et al, 2017;Bertolesi et al, 2018), analysis strategies able to take into account the settlement of the supports (Galassi et al, 2018a,b;Zampieri et al, 2018aZampieri et al, ,b, 2019 or geometry uncertainties (Cavalagli et al, 2017), macro-element models (Cannizzaro et al, 2018;D'Altri et al, 2019), and methods based on finite element modeling (FEM) (Brencich and Sabia, 2008;Costa et al, 2016;Scozzese et al, 2019), discrete element modeling (DEM) (Sarhosis et al, 2016(Sarhosis et al, , 2019Forgács et al, 2017Forgács et al, , 2018Stockdale et al, 2019) or a combination of both (Milani and Lourenço, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%