2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11227-020-03170-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incremental collusive fraud detection in large-scale online auction networks

Abstract: An online auction network (OAN) is a community of users who buy or sell items through an auction site. Along with the growing popularity of auction sites, concerns about auction frauds and criminal activities have increased. As a result, fraud detection in OANs has attracted renewed interest from researchers. Since most real OANs are large-scale networks, detecting fraudulent users is usually difficult, especially when multiple users collude with each other and new online auctions are continuously added. Altho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It suggests a protocol to investigate networks within the public sector based on a quantitative method. It also emphasizes the interactive effects of companies that might impact the granting of contracts in decision-making, besides the influence of weak and strong bonds between firms on the contracts 33 (Khomnotai & Lin 2015) Recognize scams on online auctions by exploring the concept of neighborhood diversity as an effective resource to identify competitiveness and joint participation between companies that may be acting together to defraud bids regularly 34 (Dadfarnia et al 2020) Detect fraudulent users in collusive acts in online auctions 35 (Zhu et al 2020) Design a social networking standard to detect possible bidder conspiracy in the construction sector 36 (Lei et al 2018a, b) Detect the formation of scheming groups in auctions through collusive activities or manipulation of the average price of the bids towards a higher or even unrealistic winning price…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It suggests a protocol to investigate networks within the public sector based on a quantitative method. It also emphasizes the interactive effects of companies that might impact the granting of contracts in decision-making, besides the influence of weak and strong bonds between firms on the contracts 33 (Khomnotai & Lin 2015) Recognize scams on online auctions by exploring the concept of neighborhood diversity as an effective resource to identify competitiveness and joint participation between companies that may be acting together to defraud bids regularly 34 (Dadfarnia et al 2020) Detect fraudulent users in collusive acts in online auctions 35 (Zhu et al 2020) Design a social networking standard to detect possible bidder conspiracy in the construction sector 36 (Lei et al 2018a, b) Detect the formation of scheming groups in auctions through collusive activities or manipulation of the average price of the bids towards a higher or even unrealistic winning price…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%