2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1957-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incremental citation impact due to international co-authorship in Hungarian higher education institutions

Abstract: International co-authorship is generally thought and often found to have positive effects on the citation rate of scientific publications. We study the effect quantitatively in the example of four major and four medium Hungarian universities. The conclusions may be generalized to other countries of similar international status.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, which could increase knowledge flows and visibility in the global research arena (Figg et al 2006;Inzelt et al 2009). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, which could increase knowledge flows and visibility in the global research arena (Figg et al 2006;Inzelt et al 2009). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This holds, especially, for the life sciences. Somewhat astonishingly, nevertheless, in some cases in the natural sciences, ''visibility'' of multinational publications, as measured by 3-year journals impact measures, does not notably deviate from that of bilateral or even domestic papers (Inzelt et al 2009). On the other hand, there are hints that the effect of collaboration on citations may rely on the cooperating country (Kim 2001) or on the discipline (Frederiksen 2004).…”
Section: Citation Performancementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Based on a more comprehensive analysis in the field of chemistry, Glänzel and Schubert (2001) brought in the concepts of ''hot links'' and ''cool links'' to signify particularly successful (in terms of citation impact) and unsuccessful collaborations between pairs of countries. We define the indicator incremental citation impact (Inzelt et al 2009), D k to characterize the ''citation success'' of cooperation in the field of nanobiopharmaceutcials as follows:…”
Section: Citation Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, maximum output is observed in the team strength of two authors (34.46%), followed by group of three (28.24%), four (17.10%), single author (15.80%) and five authors (4.40%) respectively. Inzelt et al [44] believe that scientific collaboration and co-authorship has significant influence on citation rate of publications. The most evident form of scientific collaboration is co-authorship, which is a frequent and reliable target of scientometric studies on collaboration [45][46][47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Authorship Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%