AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum 2019
DOI: 10.2514/6.2019-0110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incremental Backstepping Sliding Mode Fault-Tolerant Flight Control

Abstract: Fault-tolerant flight control has the potential of improving the aircraft survivability in real life. This paper proposes an Incremental Backstepping Sliding Mode Control (IBSMC) framework for multi-input/output nonlinear strict-feedback systems considering model uncertainties, sudden faults, and external disturbances. This approach is a hybridization of the Sliding Mode Control (SMC) and a reformulated Incremental Backstepping (IBS). By virtue of the benefits contributed by both SMC and IBS, theoretical analy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the control Lyapunov function (CLF) V defined in Eq. (18) with the suitably chosen positive-definite weight matrices ðQ, Γ d , Γ ξ Þ, the controller structure can be designed to meet the stability condition _ V ≤ 0 as shown in Eq. (19).…”
Section: Design Of Incremental Backstepping Slidingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the control Lyapunov function (CLF) V defined in Eq. (18) with the suitably chosen positive-definite weight matrices ðQ, Γ d , Γ ξ Þ, the controller structure can be designed to meet the stability condition _ V ≤ 0 as shown in Eq. (19).…”
Section: Design Of Incremental Backstepping Slidingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, BSC and SMC designs with the incremental dynamics provides the integral control function, which can further reduce the steady-state errors and additionally improve the robustness to external disturbances. It is well known that the incremental BSC (IBSC) design is not effective to compensate the matched disturbance, and its adaptive version typically requires a prior knowledge on the size of uncertainty or the uncertainty prediction [18]. Thus, the uncertainty compensation method such as the tuning function (TF), immersion and invariance (I&I), and least-squares (LS) methods has been widely studied to effectively handle matched disturbances [19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(13,19), the control law designed using the structure of INDI does not require the model information of f . Even through the model dependency of INDI-SMC/SMDO is reduced, its robustness is enhanced by virtue of its sensor-based structure [24,28,36]. This distinguishes INDI-SMC/SMDO from Ref.…”
Section: The Total Control Command Of Indimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first issue is the way of obtainingΩ 0 when applying Eqs. (19,36) in the inner-loop. The feasibility of directly measuringΩ 0 via angular accelerometers has been demonstrated in Ref.…”
Section: When Comparingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, theoretical proofs and simulations demonstrate that a wide range of model uncertainties, sudden actuator faults, and structural damage can be passively resisted by INDI-SMC, without using additional fault detection and isolation modules [14]. The hybridization idea was carried forward in [15], where the incremental backstepping sliding mode control (IBSMC) is proposed for multi-input/multi-output nonlinear strict-feedback perturbed systems. Theoretical analyses and simulations show IBSMC has less model dependency but enhanced robustness than model-based backstepping sliding mode control in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%