2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04990-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing water and energy efficiency in university buildings: a case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results concur with those of Rodrigues et al (2019), who reported on average a 27% reduction in water consumption in a university building by applying low-cost measures such as the reduction in flow and volume in appliances, for which the overall payback period was seven months. These authors also highlighted the reduction in energy consumption resulting from savings in water consumption, which was estimated at 1.93 kWh/m 3 , reaching almost 0.5% of the building’s energy consumption.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results concur with those of Rodrigues et al (2019), who reported on average a 27% reduction in water consumption in a university building by applying low-cost measures such as the reduction in flow and volume in appliances, for which the overall payback period was seven months. These authors also highlighted the reduction in energy consumption resulting from savings in water consumption, which was estimated at 1.93 kWh/m 3 , reaching almost 0.5% of the building’s energy consumption.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These numbers are about 11% and approximately 35% of total UDC consumption (Table 5). The ratio of consumption in taps to consumption in TFV plus cisterns was 0.31, which compares well with that of 0.21 reported by Rodrigues et al (2019) for a single building. The rest of the consumption is distributed between the university canteens (17%), the maintenance of sports areas and activities (26 %) and the laboratories (11%).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the obtained results for the water consumption, the flow rates of these water devices were adjusted to the reference values of class "A" water efficiency (the highest efficiency) of the Portuguese labeling system [29]. Nevertheless, when used in public buildings, their application is not very strict for health reasons, to ensure the proper functioning of drainage systems and adequate levels of user comfort [7]. Therefore, when possible, suggestions for more efficient devices were proposed to achieve higher water efficiency.…”
Section: Water Efficiency Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, water potabilization processes, the delivery of water to consumers, and the treatment of wastewater use significant amounts of energy, contributing to increasing CO 2 and other greenhouse gas emissions [1,5,6]. Therefore, in the face of this scenario, it is important to implement water sustainability, promoting water use efficiency by reducing water consumption through the adoption of efficient products or devices (e.g., taps and showers), reducing waste and losses, and by reusing and recycling water [7]. Public indoor swimmingpool facilities use large amounts of water and, consequently, energy, because of their particular characteristics: (1) the relatively high temperature and humidity levels in the pool room; (2) the evaporation caused by pool usage; (3) the use of warm water for pools and showers; and (4) the requirement of a water treatment system [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%