2019
DOI: 10.1109/tr.2018.2850315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing Validity of Simulation Models Through Metamorphic Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work [24], the authors compared four search engines with respect to different scenarios and factors, thereby providing users and developers with a more comprehensive understanding of how to choose a proper search engine for better searching services with clear and definite objectives. Olsen and Raunak [25] applied MT for simulation validation, involving two prevalent simulation approaches: agentbased simulation and discret-event simulation. Guidelines were also provided for identifying MRs for both simulation approaches.…”
Section: Metamorphic Testing (Mt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work [24], the authors compared four search engines with respect to different scenarios and factors, thereby providing users and developers with a more comprehensive understanding of how to choose a proper search engine for better searching services with clear and definite objectives. Olsen and Raunak [25] applied MT for simulation validation, involving two prevalent simulation approaches: agentbased simulation and discret-event simulation. Guidelines were also provided for identifying MRs for both simulation approaches.…”
Section: Metamorphic Testing (Mt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guidelines were also provided for identifying MRs for both simulation approaches. Case studies [25] showed how MT can help increase users's confidence in the correctness of the simulation models.…”
Section: Metamorphic Testing (Mt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MT, now twenty years old, is fast-becoming the first choice for testers of these systems. Since the acceptance for publication of our paper (August 2018) [1], a number of new and exciting directions for MT have come to light, including (but not limited to): metamorphic exploration (an MT-inspired approach that helps users, including testers, better understand and use systems) [2]; MT's application to post-quantum cryptography, as explored at the Loyola University and the American National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [3]; simulation validation using MT [4]; metamorphic robustness testing (revealing hidden defects in the citation database systems Scopus and Web of Science, hence challenging the validity of citation statistics and journal impact factors) [5]; and a reported technique for detecting fatal software faults in the LiDAR obstacle-perception module of self-driving cars, with alarming results reported eight days before Uber's deadly crash in Tempe, Arizona, USA, in March 2018 [6].…”
Section: Recent Mt Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been conducted to use MT to test the software for scientific computations and simulations. For instances, in testing simulations, MT has been successfully adopted to test agent-based (ABM) and discrete-event (DES) simulations [26], hybrid ABM and DES systems [11], health care simulation [25], webenabled simulation [1], and simulator platform for self-driving cars [36,41]. In testing scientific software, MT is an effective technique to detect faults in simulation programs for designing nuclear power plants [14], bioinformatics programs [4], epidemiological models [31,33], chemical reaction networks for prototyping nano-scale molecular devices [13], matrix calculation programs [32], solvers for partial differential equations [3], multiple linear regression software [22], ocean modelling [16], storm water management model systems [19], machine learning-based hydro-logical models [40], Monte-Carlo computational programs [10,30], serverless scientific applications [20], as well as other types of scientific software [9,18,19,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%