2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6807(200005)37:3<263::aid-pits6>3.0.co;2-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing tootling: The effects of a peer-monitored group contingency program on students' reports of peers' prosocial behaviors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
97
0
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
97
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The study adds to what is known about CW-FIT and also the literature reporting the effects of interdependent group-oriented contingencies (e.g., Cashwell et al, 2001;Conklin et al, 2010;Kamps, 2009;Kamps et al, 2010;Skinner et al, 2000). This replication study adds to the generalizability of the CW-FIT effects on a wider range of teachers, behaviors, and grade levels.…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The study adds to what is known about CW-FIT and also the literature reporting the effects of interdependent group-oriented contingencies (e.g., Cashwell et al, 2001;Conklin et al, 2010;Kamps, 2009;Kamps et al, 2010;Skinner et al, 2000). This replication study adds to the generalizability of the CW-FIT effects on a wider range of teachers, behaviors, and grade levels.…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 52%
“…Hence, the design of the educational environment must provide for more than preventing disruptive behaviors, it must also have systems for increasing prosocial behaviors (Winett & Winker, 1972). In regard to these concerns, a few researchers have used interdependent group contingencies to increase social skills (e.g., Winett, Battersby, & Edwards, 1975), increase appropriate classroom behavior (Babyak et al, 2000;Greenwood, Hops, Delquadri, & Guild, 1974;Koch & Breyer, 1974), and increase students' reports of their peers prosocial behaviors (Cashwell et al, 2001;Skinner, Cashwell, & Skinner, 2000).…”
Section: Effects Of Interdependent Group Contingencies On Prosocial Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PAX GBG also uses teacher and peer praise notes to identify and reinforce pro-social behavior (Parsons, 1982, Kelley, 1990& Skinner, Cashwell, & Skinner, 2000. This has shown to increase friendships networks, improve gratitude, and even protect against bullying and threats to status.…”
Section: Kernels To Address Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…nach McGinnis et al, 1995 (Nolting, 2002). Häufig werden hingegen unerwünschte Verhaltensweisen und entsprechende negative Konsequenzen benannt (Skinner, Cashwell & Skinner, 2000 (Wentzel, 2003).…”
Section: Klassenregelnunclassified