1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00700358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing the structural strength of steel 09G2S with ferritic-martensitic structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The revealed transformations of the steel structure will significantly affect the strength and plastic characteristics of the metal, determining the service life of the product. The evaluation of the strengthening mechanisms allows the patterns connecting the The main contributions to the deformation resistance are as follows [30][31][32][33]: σ 0 = 35 MPa-friction stress of the dislocations in the crystal lattice of α-iron; σ ss -strengthening of a ferritebased solid solution by atoms of alloying elements; σ p -strengthening due to the pearlite; σ h -strengthening by the dislocations "herringbone" that cut the slipping dislocations; σ or -strengthening of the material by incoherent particles when bypassing them with dislocations according to the Orowan mechanism; σ l -strengthening by the internal longrange stress fields; and σ s -substructural strengthening.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The revealed transformations of the steel structure will significantly affect the strength and plastic characteristics of the metal, determining the service life of the product. The evaluation of the strengthening mechanisms allows the patterns connecting the The main contributions to the deformation resistance are as follows [30][31][32][33]: σ 0 = 35 MPa-friction stress of the dislocations in the crystal lattice of α-iron; σ ss -strengthening of a ferritebased solid solution by atoms of alloying elements; σ p -strengthening due to the pearlite; σ h -strengthening by the dislocations "herringbone" that cut the slipping dislocations; σ or -strengthening of the material by incoherent particles when bypassing them with dislocations according to the Orowan mechanism; σ l -strengthening by the internal longrange stress fields; and σ s -substructural strengthening.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quite often, the plates of cementite in perlite are curved and separated by ferritic bridges (Figure 3). Thus, it is believed that ferrite is solid in perlite, and cementite is an intermittent phase consisting of separate plates [24,25]. The contrast along the cementite plate is heterogeneous, which indicates the disorientation of one part of the plate relative to the other.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In steels of various purposes, in the process of tempering, a heterogeneous mechanism of separation of the second phase is generally realized with the formation of particles at the boundaries and at the joints of grains, at subboundaries and dislocations. Apart from that, formation of laminar two-phase structures that occur during pearlitic transformation is possible [38].…”
Section: Internal Stresses In Two-phase Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And since the amplitude of bending-torsion of the crystal lattice χ [7] is inversely proportional to the width of bend contour, then the value of χ in the cementite plate is almost 4 times higher than in the ferrite plate: χ (α-phase) = 420 cm -1 ; χ (Fe3C) = 1750 cm -1 . Considering that the shear moduli of crystal lattices of ferrite and cementite phases are close [38], it turns out that the amplitude of internal stresses in cementite plates is several times higher than in the ferrite interlayer. The reason for this behavior is less plastic stress relaxation inside the cementite plates than in the α-phase interlayers.…”
Section: Internal Stresses In Two-phase Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%