2015
DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1011649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing the Relative Weight of Noncognitive Admission Criteria Improves Underrepresented Minority Admission Rates to Medical School

Abstract: Admission rates of URM students can be increased by weighting noncognitive higher relative to cognitive criteria without compromising admission standards. Challenging conventional practice in the admissions process may improve health disparities and diversify the physician workforce.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GPA, MCAT) of the application stage can increase the proportion of URIM students accepted. 10 The converse has also been demonstrated, in that URIM acceptance rates decreased as the weighting on GPA and MCAT increased. 12 However, these conclusions have not been universal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…GPA, MCAT) of the application stage can increase the proportion of URIM students accepted. 10 The converse has also been demonstrated, in that URIM acceptance rates decreased as the weighting on GPA and MCAT increased. 12 However, these conclusions have not been universal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…8 Multiple investigators have studied the impact of different recruitment and admissions strategies on the diversity of matriculating medical students. These have included adding an "adjustment" to pre-interview scores for URIM applicants, 9 increasing the weighting on non-academic criteria 10 and the use of the MMI. The MMI interview style has gained support as studies have demonstrated that performance does not seem to be impacted by gender, family income level, size of community of origin, 11 or ethnicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of methodologies are available for scoring personal attributes, experiences, and metrics that can be equitably applied to enhance diversity or other outcomes, such as rural selection, 29 without changing minimum admission requirements or other academic metrics. 30 There are over 30 distinct factors that can be categorized in different ways as attributes, experiences, and metrics.…”
Section: Applicant-selection Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This aligned with literature findings that increased weighting on noncognitive factors increases admissions potential for minority students while maintaining academic quality of applicants. 17 To assess the efficacy of this new model and selection process, the program performed a retrospective evaluation comparing students who graduated on-time (successful) to those who were delayed due to academic probation and those who failed courses and were eventually dismissed from the program.…”
Section: In Nt Tr Ro Od Du Uc Ct Ti Io On Nmentioning
confidence: 99%