2005
DOI: 10.1017/s0266462305050221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing the generalizability of economic evaluations: Recommendations for the design, analysis, and reporting of studies

Abstract: Objectives:Health technology assessment (HTA) is increasingly an international activity, and HTA agencies collaborate to avoid unnecessary duplication of effort. However, the sharing of the results from HTAs raises questions about their generalizability; namely, are the results of an HTA undertaken in one country relevant to another?Methods:This study presents recommendations for increasing the generalizability of economic evaluations. They represent an important component of HTAs and are commonly thought to h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
167
0
10

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
167
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimates of resource use, costs, and outcome values are sensitive to features of local contexts, such as prices, preferences and the configuration of service delivery (see also, inter alia, Chapters 3, 4, 8 and 13). 17,56,57 This may limit the generalisability and transferability of such estimates across settings. Therefore, selection of the best available sources of locally applicable data for a specific context is ( subject to availability), arguably, likely to be preferable to (adjusted) estimates based on data collected in other settings and to pooled estimates derived using a synthesis of (adjusted) data collected from several studies conducted in different settings (see also, inter alia, Chapters 3, 4 and 9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Estimates of resource use, costs, and outcome values are sensitive to features of local contexts, such as prices, preferences and the configuration of service delivery (see also, inter alia, Chapters 3, 4, 8 and 13). 17,56,57 This may limit the generalisability and transferability of such estimates across settings. Therefore, selection of the best available sources of locally applicable data for a specific context is ( subject to availability), arguably, likely to be preferable to (adjusted) estimates based on data collected in other settings and to pooled estimates derived using a synthesis of (adjusted) data collected from several studies conducted in different settings (see also, inter alia, Chapters 3, 4 and 9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 In a CBA, measures of the outcomes of compared interventions are valued monetarily based on estimates of people's willingness to pay for these outcomes, which is calculated using stated preference methods (contingent valuation), revealed preference methods or the human capital approach. 17,18 Examples of the use of monetary valuation techniques to undertake a CBA can be found in the evaluation of criminal justice interventions. 19,20 Donaldson and colleagues identified a number of approaches to the use of systematic reviews to inform economic evaluations of health care interventions.…”
Section: Using Systematic Reviews In Economic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,31 The checklists are intended to be useful for decision makers using economic evaluations, but may also be useful for those planning or undertaking economic evaluations. If the principles suggested in the complex interventions, with only two contributions by health economists on the implications for assessing their cost-effectiveness.…”
Section: Checklists For Assessing the Generalisability Of Economic Evmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several authors argued that it is time for a common standard for cost-effectiveness in Europe [1,2]. Jönsson [3] pointed out that today, 30 years after the first steps were taken to introduce economic evaluation as an instrument in health policy in Europe, it is time to go further.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%