2016
DOI: 10.1002/stc.1921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing the efficiency and efficacy of second-order blind identification (SOBI) methods

Abstract: SUMMARYThis paper proposes a new technique to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of second-order blind identification (SOBI) methods by reducing the number of time-lagged covariance matrices required to produce highly accurate mixing matrix estimates. The technique is based on randomly selecting the time-lagged covariance matrices as opposed to choosing them sequentially, which takes advantage of a property of independence with regard to the selection of time-lagged covariance matrices, while simultaneo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The algorithm is based on the combination of different OMA techniques in order to make possible the automatic analysis and interpretation of the stabilization diagram. The modal parameter estimation is basically carried out according to the covariance‐driven Stochastic Subspace Identification (SSI) method, but the preliminary Blind Source Separation (BSS), operated by the Second‐Order Blind Identification (SOBI) procedure, simplifies the identification of the physical poles; the interested reader can refer to Ghahari et al, Yang and Nagarajaiah, and Abazarsa et al for more details about applications of BSS and SOBI in the context of dynamic parameter identification and SHM. In fact, as a result of BSS, the raw data associated to the measured structural response are transformed into sources, which can be well‐separated (they show the contribution of a single mode to the structural response), not well‐separated (noise or minor contributions from other modes could be superimposed to the contribution of the main mode), or noise sources .…”
Section: Automated Oma and Shmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm is based on the combination of different OMA techniques in order to make possible the automatic analysis and interpretation of the stabilization diagram. The modal parameter estimation is basically carried out according to the covariance‐driven Stochastic Subspace Identification (SSI) method, but the preliminary Blind Source Separation (BSS), operated by the Second‐Order Blind Identification (SOBI) procedure, simplifies the identification of the physical poles; the interested reader can refer to Ghahari et al, Yang and Nagarajaiah, and Abazarsa et al for more details about applications of BSS and SOBI in the context of dynamic parameter identification and SHM. In fact, as a result of BSS, the raw data associated to the measured structural response are transformed into sources, which can be well‐separated (they show the contribution of a single mode to the structural response), not well‐separated (noise or minor contributions from other modes could be superimposed to the contribution of the main mode), or noise sources .…”
Section: Automated Oma and Shmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this technique, it is assumed that all sources are fully uncorrelated and the intensity of white noises is relatively small for removal. The blind source separation technique has been applied to structural mode identification and anomaly detection based on extracted mixture by using response second-order statistics [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. In those researches, all sources were separated except for small noises removed and particularly the sources were assumed as fully uncorrelated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%