1994
DOI: 10.1016/0009-8981(94)90113-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing the biosafety of analytical systems in the clinical laboratory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multifactorial parameter interactions throughout each manufacturing process are often difficult to profile using conventional lab‐scale experiments, due to limited throughput and the lengthy time cycles of production for some viruses. Further, many live virus production processes are subject to higher levels of biosafety handling procedures that require more intensive decontamination, isolation, and waste handling protocols, complicating the application of lab automation devices, such as liquid handling systems . Finally, product quality assessment for live viruses often requires panels of multiple assays, such as plaque potency and ELISA that are generally difficult to apply to high‐throughput studies with large numbers of samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multifactorial parameter interactions throughout each manufacturing process are often difficult to profile using conventional lab‐scale experiments, due to limited throughput and the lengthy time cycles of production for some viruses. Further, many live virus production processes are subject to higher levels of biosafety handling procedures that require more intensive decontamination, isolation, and waste handling protocols, complicating the application of lab automation devices, such as liquid handling systems . Finally, product quality assessment for live viruses often requires panels of multiple assays, such as plaque potency and ELISA that are generally difficult to apply to high‐throughput studies with large numbers of samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%