2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10797-019-09575-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing tax transparency: investor reactions to the country-by-country reporting requirement for EU financial institutions

Abstract: We employ an event study methodology to investigate the stock price reaction around the day of the political decision to include a country-by-country reporting obligation for EU financial institutions. We do not find significant abnormal returns for the banks affected. Sample splits according to the effective tax rate and the degree of B2C orientation do not reveal a more pronounced negative investor response for banks engaging more strongly in tax avoidance or being potentially more concerned about reputation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
26
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our paper supplements a few concurrent studies on the consequences of public CbCR under CRD IV (e.g., Brown 2018;Dutt et al 2018;. Our findings are consistent with the results of Dutt et al (2018) and Brown (2018) but differ from those of .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our paper supplements a few concurrent studies on the consequences of public CbCR under CRD IV (e.g., Brown 2018;Dutt et al 2018;. Our findings are consistent with the results of Dutt et al (2018) and Brown (2018) but differ from those of .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Our paper supplements a few concurrent studies on the consequences of public CbCR under CRD IV (e.g., Brown 2018;Dutt et al 2018;. Our findings are consistent with the results of Dutt et al (2018) and Brown (2018) but differ from those of . 3 Dutt et al (2018) investigate the stock price reaction around the day of the decision, including CbCR in CRD IV, and document a lack of noticeable market response.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Johannesen and Larsen (2016) document a considerable negative capital market response around two of four key dates in the legislation process of the EU Accounting Directive, which introduced a CbCR obligation for EU companies in the extractive industries. The results of Dutt et al (2019), however, are suggestive of a zero investor response to the surprising political decision to include a CbCR requirement for EU financial institutions in the CRD IV. They conclude that investors expected a simultaneous decline in banks' tax avoidance opportunities and in information asymmetries between managers and shareholders, such that negative and positive stock price reactions offset each other on average.…”
Section: Impact and Information Content Of Cbcrmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…First, we shed light on the effectiveness of CbCR. While a few recent studies analyze the impact of CbCR on EU banks' tax avoidance behavior (Joshi et al 2018;Overesch and Wolff 2019) and on their stock prices (Dutt et al 2019), empirical evidence on the information content of the published data itself is at an early stage (Bouvatier et al 2018;Fatica and Gregori 2018;Janský 2018). We provide comprehensive descriptive evidence on the CbCR data published by more than 100 EU banks and apply refined regression specifications to estimate the tax sensitivity of reported profits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies investigate both public and non-public CbCR and its real effects (R. J. Brown, 2018;Dutt, Ludwig, Nicolay, Vay, & Voget, 2019;Eberhartinger, Speitmann, & Sureth-Sloane, 2020;Joshi, Outslay, & Persson, 2020;Overesch & Wolff, 2017;Simone & Olbert, 2019). While it is known that the information disclosed through CbCR is potentially misleading none of these studies scrutinizes the extend to which misperception impedes transparency and generates undesired implications.…”
Section: Corporate Tax Misperceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%