2013
DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/29/2/025012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing stability in an inverse problem for the acoustic equation

Abstract: In this work we study the inverse boundary value problem of determining the refractive index in the acoustic equation. It is known that this inverse problem is ill-posed. Nonetheless, we show that the ill-posedness decreases when we increase the frequency and the stability estimate changes from logarithmic type for low frequencies to a Lipschitz estimate for large frequencies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study of the increasing stability phenomenon has attracted a lot of attention recently. There are several results [7], [8], [9] and [12] which rigorously demonstrated the increasing stability behaviours in different settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The study of the increasing stability phenomenon has attracted a lot of attention recently. There are several results [7], [8], [9] and [12] which rigorously demonstrated the increasing stability behaviours in different settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Unfortunately, the use of CGO's solutions leads naturally to a dependence of the stability constant on frequency of exponential type. This is clearly far from being optimal as it is also pointed out in the paper of Nagayasu, Uhlmann and Wang [18]. There the authors prove a stability estimate, in terms of Cauchy data instead of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map using CGO solutions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, there is no efficient stability increasing with respect to increasing coefficient regularity in these results of [15]. An additional study, motivated by [15,29], was given in [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%