Frontiers in Optics / Laser Science 2018
DOI: 10.1364/fio.2018.fth3b.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing Sensitivity of an Atom Interferometer to the Heisenberg Limit using Enhanced Quantum Noise

Abstract: In a conventional atomic interferometer employing N atoms, the phase sensitivity is at the standard quantum limit: 1/ √ N . Using spin-squeezing, the sensitivity can be increased, either by lowering the quantum noise or via phase amplification, or a combination thereof. Here, we show how to increase the sensitivity, to the Heisenberg limit of 1/N , while increasing the quantum noise by √ N , thereby suppressing by the same factor the effect of excess noise. The proposed protocol makes use of a Schrödinger Cat … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found in previous work that robustness to detection noise could be drastically improved by adding an interaction-based readout (IBR), which is a period of evolution after the interrogation time, to convert the final probability distribution into one that is more robust to detection noise [24,27,35,36]. This often involves reversal of the initial state preparation dynamics (commonly referred to as an 'echo') to restore the initial coherent spin-state [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. However, it was shown in [46] that there are schemes that perform significantly better than this.…”
Section: Optimising Robustness To Detection Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found in previous work that robustness to detection noise could be drastically improved by adding an interaction-based readout (IBR), which is a period of evolution after the interrogation time, to convert the final probability distribution into one that is more robust to detection noise [24,27,35,36]. This often involves reversal of the initial state preparation dynamics (commonly referred to as an 'echo') to restore the initial coherent spin-state [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. However, it was shown in [46] that there are schemes that perform significantly better than this.…”
Section: Optimising Robustness To Detection Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason why there is no need for the extra application of U flip is because the state U † 1 |ψ φ already yields a probability distribution identical to P opt , and is unchanged by application of U flip . The outstanding performance of the echo IBR for this state was first reported in [60] and subsequently in [61,65], but it was not known that this is the maximum achievable sensitivity [79].…”
Section: Approaching the Nqcrb With Oat-based Ibrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been considerable interest in the concept of interaction-based readouts (IBRs) [50,51,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66], which are periods of unitary evolution applied to the system after the phase encoding step, but before the measurement takes place. These readouts usually involve inter-particle interactions, similar to the ones used for the state preparation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…phase or detection noise). One way to conquer these effects is to use interaction-based readout protocols [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] which make use of the appropriate unitary/supplementary operations right before final measurement. These schemes can be summarised as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%