2022
DOI: 10.1002/ps.6932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing risk of aphids spreading plant viruses in maize fields on both sides of China's Heihe‐Tengchong line under climate change

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In the coming decades, geographical distribution patterns of farmland organisms may undergo drastic changes due to climate change, with significant implications for global food security. In China, Rhopalosiphum maidis and its spread of sugarcane mosaic virus (ScMV) can become an increasingly serious threat to maize (Zea mays) production. We conducted ecological niche modeling for Z. mays, R. maidis, and ScMV under current and future (2041-2060 and 2081-2100) climate scenarios by using MaxEnt softwa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest cited article (817 times cited) was published from the Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA. Other leading institute which carry out plant virus vector relationships are University of California, Davis (UC Davis), USA, Plant Pathology Department, University of California, Davis, Institute of Biochemical Plant Pathology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Key Laboratory of Plant Virology of Fujian Province, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, China (Jones and Naidu, 2019).China has witnessed rapid growth in scienti c research over the past decade, including in the area of plant virus-vector relationships(Li et al, 2022). Countries such as the United States, China, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Spain have been prominent in the eld of plant virus-vector relationships.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest cited article (817 times cited) was published from the Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA. Other leading institute which carry out plant virus vector relationships are University of California, Davis (UC Davis), USA, Plant Pathology Department, University of California, Davis, Institute of Biochemical Plant Pathology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Key Laboratory of Plant Virology of Fujian Province, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, China (Jones and Naidu, 2019).China has witnessed rapid growth in scienti c research over the past decade, including in the area of plant virus-vector relationships(Li et al, 2022). Countries such as the United States, China, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Spain have been prominent in the eld of plant virus-vector relationships.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Access to real-time, accurate vector monitoring information within targeted areas, though often unavailable, is a critical component in vector-borne disease prevention and control 24 . As such, there is an urgent need for improved entomological surveillance capabilities, not only to provide effective routine vector and pathogen monitoring 238 241 , but to address the mounting challenges to effective vector control from insecticide resistance and the effects of climate change on the biology of vector-borne disease pathosystems 48 , 189 , 242 245 . By itself, the tracking system of the Photonic Fence is an effective means of monitoring flying insect vectors, one which has a practical operating distance, real-time identification of species of interest, and highly specific targeting and interdiction capabilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0–1) of occurrence of T. absoluta . The MTSPS (Maximum Test Sensitivity Plus Specificity) threshold was used to reclassify the probability( p ) into four categories: unfavourable habitats ( p ≤ MTSPS); marginally favourable habitats (MTSPS < p ≤ 0.4), favourable habitats (0.4 < p ≤ 0.6) and highly favourable habitats ( p > 0.6) (Aidoo et al, 2022; Li, Li, Wang, et al, 2022; Zhang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%