2009
DOI: 10.2118/108423-pa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing Production by Maximizing Underbalance During Perforation Using Nontraditional Lightweight Completion Fluid

Abstract: Summary The invasion of the pulverized formation rock grains and the resulting low-permeability crushed zone is the primary cause of wellbore damage in perforated completions, as established by Behrmann et al. (1991). To minimize this damage during the perforating process, it is necessary to provide a dynamic underbalance in the well that will deliberately induce flow into the wellbore for tunnel cleanup. Traditional well fluids have a limited application in depleted reservoirs because the lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grove et al [8] found that perforation depth was generally related to the formation effective stress and that increasing pore pressure increased penetration. Jan et al [9] concluded that creating a dynamic underbalance in the well that would deliberately induce flow into the wellbore for tunnel cleanup minimized this type of damage during the perforating process. Keshavarzi [10] demonstrated that explosive shaped charge perforating methods may require costly post-perforation operations and produce formation damage which results in reduced permeability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grove et al [8] found that perforation depth was generally related to the formation effective stress and that increasing pore pressure increased penetration. Jan et al [9] concluded that creating a dynamic underbalance in the well that would deliberately induce flow into the wellbore for tunnel cleanup minimized this type of damage during the perforating process. Keshavarzi [10] demonstrated that explosive shaped charge perforating methods may require costly post-perforation operations and produce formation damage which results in reduced permeability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A light drill-in fluid made of Sarapar oil and glass bubbles with addition of the corresponding stabilizing and homogenizing agents was obtained in [8]. Field tests of this fluid showed that it increases well productivity in comparison to ordinary drill-in fluid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the cost of the environmental safe drilling fluid is high and the synthesis of new type of environmental safe drilling fluid is complex 10 . In addition, lack of a new type of raw materials suitable for treatment agent, the weakness of Environment Friendly Water-Based Drilling Fluid Using Natural Vegetable Gum FENGXIA LI 1 , ZHENGKU WANG 1,* , YUNYING TIAN 2 and JIYIN ZHANG 3 the antihigh temperature resistance and the poor contamination resistance and the inhibition performance had also constrained the development of environmental safe drilling fluids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%