1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00168-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing Physicians’ Awareness of the Impact of Statistics on Research Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Shapiro-Wilk (SW) test was performed to determine whether a data set of each group is well-modeled by the normal distribution, that is, with the p value greater than 0.05 [45]. To assess statistical significance of the differences between two groups, a two sided Student's t-test was used if both groups followed the normal distribution, otherwise, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used [46]. The p value is equal to or less than 0.05 regarded as statistically significant in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Shapiro-Wilk (SW) test was performed to determine whether a data set of each group is well-modeled by the normal distribution, that is, with the p value greater than 0.05 [45]. To assess statistical significance of the differences between two groups, a two sided Student's t-test was used if both groups followed the normal distribution, otherwise, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used [46]. The p value is equal to or less than 0.05 regarded as statistically significant in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in these means were examined statistically. The datasets generated were not normally distributed (data not shown); skew in the data may affect Student’s t -test (Bridge and Sawilowsky, 1999). Thus, the non-parametric Mann–Whitney test was conducted on the datasets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…before vs. after design) are more powerful to begin with (given the reduction in error variance associated with individual differences), thus non-parametric approaches offer little power advantage under these conditions. 3 Among the reviewed studies, the most relevant to our discussion are those with between-subject-design, but 75% of these used parametric analyses. Taken together, these results suggest that parametric analyses should not be the primary statistical method for analyzing CPT data as they currently are.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%