2020
DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1846323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing Perceived Risk of Opioid Misuse: The Effects of Concrete Language and Image

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 65 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One challenge of employing descriptive norms messages is that few community members typically engage in disaster risk mitigation behaviors (Brody et al., 2017 ; Lim, 2021 ; Peacock, 2003 ), making it challenging to accurately include percentages in messages. Unlike other contexts, such as health and environment behaviors (Cialdini et al., 2006 ; Goldstein et al., 2007 ; Hallsworth et al., 2017 ), employing vague language like “many” may not be the most persuasive approach (Grazzini et al., 2018 ; Qin et al., 2020 ) in a disaster context, where not many people engage in the behavior, although only one study (Howe et al., 2018 ) found that descriptive norm messages using “many people” (p. 3) were effective in the wildfire context.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One challenge of employing descriptive norms messages is that few community members typically engage in disaster risk mitigation behaviors (Brody et al., 2017 ; Lim, 2021 ; Peacock, 2003 ), making it challenging to accurately include percentages in messages. Unlike other contexts, such as health and environment behaviors (Cialdini et al., 2006 ; Goldstein et al., 2007 ; Hallsworth et al., 2017 ), employing vague language like “many” may not be the most persuasive approach (Grazzini et al., 2018 ; Qin et al., 2020 ) in a disaster context, where not many people engage in the behavior, although only one study (Howe et al., 2018 ) found that descriptive norm messages using “many people” (p. 3) were effective in the wildfire context.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%