Increasing Organizational Evidence Based Practice Capacity Through an Evidence Based Practice Scholars Program

Bartlett, Jacqueline A.; Allen, Nancy C.

doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2013.04.003

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We utilized an institutional evidence-based practice team that used Cochrane Collaborative software packages (i.e., Review Manager, Gradepro) and a validated tool (i.e., Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation [AGREE] instrument) to assess existing guidelines and develop recommendations for services missing from the literature. [23][24] The recommendations are well established for some services (e.g., annual Chlamydia screening for sexually active adolescent females), while others are less clear (e.g., annual Chlamydia screening for heterosexual adolescent males). We describe an example of a clinical question, the corresponding search strategy and selected articles in Data Supplement S1 (available as supporting information in the online version of this paper).…”

Section: Cds System Development and Expansionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of a Novel Computerized Clinical Decision Support System to Improve Adolescent Sexual Health Care Provision

Miller

Mollen

Behr

et al. 2018

Academic Emergency Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To develop an acceptable clinical decision support (CDS) system to facilitate evidence-based sexual health care for adolescents in the emergency department (ED). Methods:In this multi-phased iterative process, we engaged an expert group to synthesize evidence on a wide range of sexual health services (e.g., contraception, condoms, identification and treatment of previously diagnosed sexually transmitted infection). We created a computerized questionnaire and embedded our decision-tree, utilizing patient-entered responses to create tailored, evidence-based recommendations, and embedded links to study-related resources such as the emergency contraception (EC) Quick Guide. We utilized mixed methodology to explore perspectives of adolescents aged 14-19 years and clinicians at two general and two pediatric EDs

show abstract

Section: Cds System Development and Expansionmentioning

confidence: 99%